Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25185016›Full record

Trial reportPeritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis

Prospective Randomized Study Comparing a Single-Cuff Self-Locating Catheter with a Single-Cuff Straight Tenckhoff Catheter in Peritoneal Dialysis.

Juan J Sanchez-Canel, Hector Garcia-Perez, Rafael Garcia-Calvo, Maria J Pascual, David Casado

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juan J Sanchez-CanelNephrology, Hospital General de Castellón, Castellón, Spain sancajj@gmail.com.
Hector Garcia-PerezNephrology, Hospital General de Castellón, Castellón, Spain.
Rafael Garcia-CalvoGeneral Surgery, Hospital General de Castellón, Castellón, Spain.
Maria J PascualNephrology, Hospital General de Castellón, Castellón, Spain.
David CasadoGeneral Surgery, Hospital General de Castellón, Castellón, Spain.
Hospital General Universitari de Castelló · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelled♦

objectivesPeritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters are critical to the success of the technique. However, few studies provide evidence about which design helps to reduce complications. Self-locating catheters (SLCs) are used to avoid displacement of the catheter tip. The incidence of mechanical and infectious complications and catheter survival rate were assessed in Tenckhoff PD catheters. ♦

designThe prospective randomized study compared drainage problems in 40 incident PD patients using a single-cuff SLCs and 38 patients using a single-cuff, straight Tenckhoff catheter (TC). ♦

resultsNo significant differences were observed in the number of complications in the Pre period (from the insertion of the catheter to the start of the technique); however, the number of complications was lower in the SLC group during Post (p = 0.021) and Total period (p = 0.048). The number of problems related to catheter malfunction for each period: Pre, Post, and Total, was significantly lower with SLCs vs TCs (p = 0.018, p = 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). Problems were solved more easily with SLCs, using laxatives, with less need for fluoroscopic placement and no need for surgical replacement, as opposed to the TC group: Pre (not significant), Post (p = 0.007), and Total (p = 0.011).Median survival was 39.6 months (30.9 - 48.3) for SLCs and 30.1 months (22.6 - 37.5) for TCs, which is not a significant difference. However, SLCs have a higher malposition-free survival rate. Multivariate logistic regression models only included the variable "type of catheter" as a predictor of malfunction during the Pre period (odds ratio [OR] = 4.154). The Post period included the variables, "type of catheter" (OR = 7.701) and "age" (OR = 1.047), and the Total period only included the variable "type of catheter" (OR = 4.487), which indicates an increased probability of malfunction with the use of TCs vs SLCs. The variables (gender, previous intra-abdominal surgery, body mass index (BMI) and diabetes mellitus) did not add predictive value to the models (p > 0.05). ♦

conclusionThe study confirms the hypothesis that TCs have more malfunctions and a lower malposition-free survival rate than SLCs, and TCs are considered as the highest risk factor for malfunction during all study periods.

Indexed as

Catheters, IndwellingPeritoneal DialysisEquipment DesignEquipment FailureFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studiescathetercontinuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysisevent-free survivalmalpositionPeritoneal dialysis

Identifiers

PMID25185016
PMCPMC4737565
OpenAlexW2162077718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.