Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25185004›Full record

ArticleMemorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz2014

Malaria in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, an Atlantic Forest area: an assessment using the health surveillance service.

Renata Bortolasse Miguel, Paulo Cesar Peiter, Hermano de Albuquerque, José Rodrigues Coura, Patrícia Ganzenmüller Moza, Anielle de Pina Costa, Patricia Brasil, Martha Cecília Suárez-Mutis

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Renata Bortolasse MiguelLaboratório de Doenças Parasitárias, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Paulo Cesar PeiterLaboratório de Doenças Parasitárias, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Hermano de AlbuquerqueLaboratório de Doenças Parasitárias, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
José Rodrigues CouraLaboratório de Doenças Parasitárias, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Patrícia Ganzenmüller MozaGerência de Doenças Transmitidas por Vetores e Zoonoses, Secretaria de Saúde e Defesa Civil do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Anielle de Pina CostaInstituto de Pesquisa Clínica Evandro Chagas-Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Patricia BrasilInstituto de Pesquisa Clínica Evandro Chagas-Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Martha Cecília Suárez-MutisLaboratório de Doenças Parasitárias, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRInstituto Evandro Chagas · BRSecretaria da Saúde · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lethality of malaria in the extra-Amazonian region is more than 70 times higher than in Amazonia itself. Recently, several studies have shown that autochthonous malaria is not a rare event in the Brazilian southeastern states in the Atlantic Forest biome. Information about autochthonous malaria in the state of Rio de Janeiro (RJ) is scarce. This study aims to assess malaria cases reported to the Health Surveillance System of the State of Rio de Janeiro between 2000-2010. An average of 90 cases per year had parasitological malaria confirmation by thick smear. The number of malaria notifications due to Plasmodium falciparum increased over time. Imported cases reported during the period studied were spread among 51% of the municipalities (counties) of the state. Only 35 cases (4.3%) were autochthonous, which represents an average of 3.8 new cases per year. Eleven municipalities reported autochthonous cases; within these, six could be characterised as areas of residual or new foci of malaria from the Atlantic Forest system. The other 28 municipalities could become receptive for transmission reintroduction. Cases occurred during all periods of the year, but 62.9% of cases were in the first semester of each year. Assessing vulnerability and receptivity conditions and vector ecology is imperative to establish the real risk of malaria reintroduction in RJ.

Indexed as

Population SurveillanceAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrazilChildChild, PreschoolFemaleForestsHumansMalariaMalaria, FalciparumMalaria, VivaxMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID25185004
PMCPMC4156456
OpenAlexW2109288607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.