Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25184734›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2014

A mechanistic, multiscale mathematical model of immunogenicity for therapeutic proteins: part 2-model applications.

X Chen, T P Hickling, P Vicini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Assessing the performance of QSP models: biology as the driver for validation.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2024
    Review
  12. SAAM II: A general mathematical modeling rapid prototyping environment.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

X ChenPharmacokinetics, Dynamics, and Metabolism, Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
T P HicklingPharmacokinetics, Dynamics, and Metabolism, Pfizer Inc, Andover, Massachusetts, USA.
P ViciniPharmacokinetics, Dynamics, and Metabolism, Pfizer Inc, San Diego, California, USA.
Pfizer (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A mechanistic, multiscale mathematical model of immunogenicity for therapeutic proteins was built by recapitulating key underlying known biological processes for immunogenicity. The model is able to simulate immune responses based on protein-specific antigenic properties (e.g., number of T-epitopes and their major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-II binding affinities) and host-specific immunological/physiological characteristics (e.g., MHC-II allele genotype, drug clearance rate). Preliminary validation was performed using mouse studies with antigens such as ovalbumin (OVA) or OVA-derived peptide. Further, using adalimumab as an example therapeutic protein, the model is able to simulate immune responses against adalimumab in individual subjects and in a population, and also provides estimations of immunogenicity incidence and drug exposure reduction that can be validated experimentally. This is a first attempt at modeling immunogenicity of biologics, so the model simulations should be used to help understand the immunogenicity mechanisms and impacting factors, rather than making direct predictions. This prototype model needs to be subjected to extensive experimental validation and refinement before fulfilling its ultimate mission of predicting immunogenicity. Nevertheless, the current model could potentially set up the starting framework to integrate various in silico, in vitro, in vivo, and clinical immunogenicity assessment results to help meet the challenge of immunogenicity prediction.

Identifiers

PMID25184734
PMCPMC4211264
OpenAlexW2121700939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.