ArticlePloS one2014
Primary reasons for osteopathic consultation: a prospective survey in Quebec.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03546114 (Does Gender Matter? Patient Preference in an Italian Osteopathic Clinical Setting), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Does Gender Matter? Patient Preference in an Italian Osteopathic Clinical Setting
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Twenty years of university-graduated osteopaths in Belgium: A cross-sectional survey.PloS one · 2026Article
- Characteristics of Australian and New Zealand osteopaths who treat patients presenting with non-musculoskeletal complaints: outcomes from two practice-based research networks.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2025Article
- Review
- Efficacy and safety of osteopathic manipulative treatment: an overview of systematic reviews.BMJ open · 2022Review
- Osteopathic empirical research: a bibliometric analysis from 1966 to 2018.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2021Article
- Opposing vaccine hesitancy during the COVID-19 pandemic - A critical commentary and united statement of an international osteopathic research community.International journal of osteopathic medicine : IJOM · 2021Article
- Osteopathy in the French-speaking part of Switzerland: Practitioners' profile and scope of back pain management.PloS one · 2020Observational
- Determinants of health, health behaviours and demographic profile of patients attending an Australian university student-led osteopathy clinic.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2020Article
- The Spanish Osteopathic Practitioners Estimates and RAtes (OPERA) study: A cross-sectional survey.PloS one · 2020Article
- The Italian Osteopathic Practitioners Estimates and RAtes (OPERA) study: How osteopaths work.PloS one · 2020Article
- Self-directed learning and practice of Italian osteopathic students during summer break: a cross-sectional survey.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2019Article
- Characteristics of complementary medicine therapists in Switzerland: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2019Article
- Article
- Profile of osteopathic practice in Spain: results from a standardized data collection study.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2018Article
- Descriptive study of interprofessional collaboration between physicians and osteopaths for the pediatric population in Quebec, Canada.BMC health services research · 2017Article
- A critical review of manual therapy use for headache disorders: prevalence, profiles, motivations, communication and self-reported effectiveness.BMC neurology · 2017Review
- Correction: primary reasons for osteopathic consultation: a prospective survey in quebec.PloS one · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOsteopathy is an increasingly popular health care modality to address pain and function in the musculoskeletal system, organs and the head region, as well as functional somatic syndromes. Although osteopathy is recommended principally in guidelines for management of back pain, osteopaths' scope of practice is wide, albeit poorly defined. In order to understand better the practice of osteopathy, this study aimed to investigate the most common reasons for osteopathic consultations in clinical settings in Quebec.
methodsA prospective survey of members of the Registre des ostéopathes du Québec was conducted to examine demographics in osteopathic practices, as well as patients' primary reasons for consultations over a two-week period. The questionnaire was devised following a literature review and refined and verified with two stages of expert input.
results277 osteopaths (60[corrected]% response rate) responded to the survey notice. 14,002 patients' primary reasons for consultations were reported in completed questionnaires and returned by practicing osteopaths. Musculoskeletal pain located in the spine, thorax, pelvis and limbs was the most common reason for consultations (61.9%), with females consulting most commonly for cervical pain and males for lumbar pain. Perinatal and paediatric (11.8%), head (9.1%), visceral (5.0%) and general concerns (4.8%) were the other most common reasons for consultations. Preventive care represented the remaining 0.3%.
interpretationThe nature of primary reasons for osteopathic consultations, coupled with documented satisfaction of patients with this approach, suggest a future for multidisciplinary collaborative health care including osteopathy. Results of this survey may contribute to informing physicians and others pending regulation of Quebec osteopaths, and also provide direction for future clinical research and guidelines development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.