Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25184111›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2014

Evaluation and updating of the Medical Malacology Collection (Fiocruz-CMM) using molecular taxonomy.

Cryslaine Aguiar-Silva, Cristiane Lafetá Furtado Mendonça, Pedro Henrique da Cunha Kellis Pinheiro, Silvia Gonçalves Mesquita, Omar Dos Santos Carvalho, Roberta Lima Caldeira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Beyond the shell: malacology in medical dermatology.Archives of dermatological research · 2024
    Review
  2. DNA barcoding as a valuable tool for delimiting mollusk species of the genusFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cryslaine Aguiar-SilvaLaboratório de Helmintologia e Malacologia Médica do Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou-Fiocruz, Av. Augusto de Lima 1715, Belo Horizonte, MG 30190-002 Brasil.
Cristiane Lafetá Furtado MendonçaLaboratório de Helmintologia e Malacologia Médica do Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou-Fiocruz, Av. Augusto de Lima 1715, Belo Horizonte, MG 30190-002 Brasil ; Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG Brasil.
Pedro Henrique da Cunha Kellis PinheiroLaboratório de Helmintologia e Malacologia Médica do Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou-Fiocruz, Av. Augusto de Lima 1715, Belo Horizonte, MG 30190-002 Brasil.
Silvia Gonçalves MesquitaLaboratório de Helmintologia e Malacologia Médica do Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou-Fiocruz, Av. Augusto de Lima 1715, Belo Horizonte, MG 30190-002 Brasil.
Omar Dos Santos CarvalhoLaboratório de Helmintologia e Malacologia Médica do Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou-Fiocruz, Av. Augusto de Lima 1715, Belo Horizonte, MG 30190-002 Brasil.
Roberta Lima CaldeiraLaboratório de Helmintologia e Malacologia Médica do Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou-Fiocruz, Av. Augusto de Lima 1715, Belo Horizonte, MG 30190-002 Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Medical Malacology Collection (Coleção de Malacologia Médica, Fiocruz-CMM) is a depository of medically relevant mollusks, especially from the genus Biomphalaria, which includes the hosts of Schistosoma mansoni. Taxonomic studies of these snails have traditionally focused on the morphology of the reproductive system. However, determination of some species is complicated by the similarity shown by these characters. Molecular techniques have been used to try to overcome this problem. DESCRIPTION: The Fiocruz-CMM utilizes morphological and/or molecular method for species' identification. However, part of the collection has not been identified by molecular techniques and some points were unidentified. The present study employs polymerase chain reaction-based analysis of restriction fragment length polymorphisms (PCR-RFLP) to evaluate the identification of Biomphalaria in the Fiocruz-CMM, correct existing errors, assess the suitability of taxonomic synonyms, and identify unknown specimens. The results indicated that 56.7% of the mollusk specimens were correctly identified, 4.0% were wrongly identified, and 0.4% was identified under taxonomic synonyms. Additionally, the PCR-RFLP analysis identified for the first time 17.6% of the specimens in the Collection. However, 3.1% of the specimens could not be identified because the mollusk tissues were degraded, and 18.2% of the specimens were inconclusively identified, demonstrating the need for new taxonomic studies in this group.

conclusionThe data was utilized to update data of Environmental Information Reference Center (CRIA). These studies demonstrate the importance of using more than one technique in taxonomic confirmation and the good preservation of specimens' collection.

Indexed as

BiomphalariaMolecular taxonomyMorphological identificationPCR-RFLPZoological collection

Identifiers

PMID25184111
PMCPMC4150920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.