Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25183780›Full record

ArticleProtein engineering, design & selection : PEDS2014

From deep sequencing to actual clones.

Sara D'Angelo, Sandeep Kumar, Leslie Naranjo, Fortunato Ferrara, Csaba Kiss, Andrew R M Bradbury

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Machine learning to predict continuous protein properties from binary cell sorting data and map unseen sequence space.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sara D'AngeloNew Mexico Consortium, Los Alamos, NM, USA amb@lanl.gov sdangelo@lanl.gov.
Sandeep KumarBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA Present address: Compugen USA, Inc., San Francisco, CA 94080, USA.
Leslie NaranjoBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA.
Fortunato FerraraNew Mexico Consortium, Los Alamos, NM, USA.
Csaba KissBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA.
Andrew R M BradburyBioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA amb@lanl.gov sdangelo@lanl.gov.
Los Alamos National Laboratory · USNew Mexico Consortium · US

Funding

A high throughput pipeline to select renewable recombinant polyclonal antibodiesU54DK093500 · NIDDK · LOS ALAMOS NAT SECTY-LOS ALAMOS NAT LAB · PI BRADBURY, ANDREW · 2011 to 2013
$4.4M
Species-by-Species Dissection of Microbiomes using Phage Display and Flow SortingR01HG004852 · NHGRI · LOS ALAMOS NAT SECTY-LOS ALAMOS NAT LAB · PI BRADBURY, ANDREW, HAN, CLIFF · 2009 to 2011
$1.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS 1R01HG004852-01A1NIDDK NIH HHS 1-U54-DK093500-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of deep sequencing to in vitro display technologies has been invaluable for the straightforward analysis of enriched clones. After sequencing in vitro selected populations, clones are binned into identical or similar groups and ordered by abundance, allowing identification of those that are most enriched. However, the greatest strength of deep sequencing is also its greatest weakness: clones are easily identified by their DNA sequences, but are not physically available for testing without a laborious multistep process involving several rounds of polymerization chain reaction (PCR), assembly and cloning. Here, using the isolation of antibody genes from a phage and yeast display selection as an example, we show the power of a rapid and simple inverse PCR-based method to easily isolate clones identified by deep sequencing. Once primers have been received, clone isolation can be carried out in a single day, rather than two days. Furthermore the reduced number of PCRs required will reduce PCR mutations correspondingly. We have observed a 100% success rate in amplifying clones with an abundance as low as 0.5% in a polyclonal population. This approach allows us to obtain full-length clones even when an incomplete sequence is available, and greatly simplifies the subcloning process. Moreover, rarer, but functional clones missed by traditional screening can be easily isolated using this method, and the approach can be extended to any selected library (scFv, cDNA, libraries based on scaffold proteins) where a unique sequence signature for the desired clones of interest is available.

Indexed as

Peptide LibraryAmino Acid SequenceBase SequenceCell Surface Display TechniquesCloning, MolecularHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingLactobacillus acidophilusMolecular Sequence DataPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNASingle-Chain AntibodiesYeastsPeptide LibrarySingle-Chain Antibodiesantibodydeep sequencinginverse PCRphage displayyeast display

Identifiers

PMID25183780
PMCPMC4191444
OpenAlexW2324929475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.