Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25183480›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2014

New strategies in personalized medicine for solid tumors: molecular markers and clinical trial designs.

Juliane M Jürgensmeier, Joseph P Eder, Roy S Herbst

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Evaluation of the Effects of Nicardipine on Entrectinib Metabolism in vitro and in Rats.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juliane M JürgensmeierYale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Joseph P EderYale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Roy S HerbstYale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. roy.herbst@yale.edu.
Yale Cancer Center · US

Funding

Yale Pathology Tissue Services Shared ResourceP30CA016359 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MEGAN C KING · 1985 to 2026
$85.0M
Personalizing NSCLC Therapy: Exploiting KRAS activated pathwaysR01CA155196 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HERBST, ROY S, PAPADIMITRAKOPOULOU, VASSILIKI · 2011 to 2015
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA155196NCI NIH HHS 2P30CA016359-34NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016359NCI NIH HHS R01 CA155196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The delineation of signaling pathways to understand tumor biology combined with the rapid development of technologies that allow broad molecular profiling and data analysis has led to a new era of personalized medicine in oncology. Many academic institutions now routinely profile patients and discuss their cases in meetings of personalized medicine tumor boards before making treatment recommendations. Clinical trials initiated by pharmaceutical companies often require specific markers for enrollment or at least explore multiple options for future markers. In addition to the still small number of targeted agents that are approved for the therapy of patients with histological and molecularly defined tumors, a broad range of novel targeted agents in development are undergoing clinical studies with companion profiling to determine the best-responding patient population. Although the present focus of profiling lies in genetic analyses, additional tests of RNA, protein, and immune parameters are being developed and incorporated in clinical research, and these methods are likely to contribute significantly to future patient selection and treatment approaches. As the advances in tumor biology and human genetics have identified promising tumor targets, the ongoing clinical evaluation of novel agents will now need to show if the promise can be translated into benefit for patients.

Indexed as

Precision MedicineBiomarkers, TumorClinical Trials as TopicGene Expression ProfilingHumansNeoplasmsPatient SelectionResearch DesignBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID25183480
PMCPMC5369358
OpenAlexW2116504782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.