Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25183422›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2015

Growth and remodelling for profound circular wounds in skin.

Min Wu, Martine Ben Amar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Min WuLaboratoire de Physique Statistique, Ecole Normale Supérieure, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Université Paris Diderot, CNRS, 24 rue Lhomond, 75005 , Paris, France.
Martine Ben Amar

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound healing studies both in vitro and in vivo have received a lot of attention recently. In vivo wound healing is a multi-step process involving physiological factors such as fibrinogen forming the clot, the infiltrated inflammatory cells, the recruited fibroblasts and the differentiated myofibroblasts as well as deposited collagens. All these actors play their roles at different times, aided by a cascade of morphogenetic agents and the result for the repair is approximatively successful but the imperfection is remained for large scars with fibrosis. Here, we want to study wound healing from the viewpoint of skin biomechanics, integrating the particular layered geometry of the skin, and the role of the neighbouring wound epidermis. After 2 days post-injury, it migrates towards the wound centre to cover the hole, the migration being coupled to proliferation at the wound border. Such a process is dominated by the skin properties which varies with ages, locations, pathologies, radiations, etc. It is also controlled by passive (actin, collagen) and active (myo-fibroblasts) fibres. We explore a growth model in finite elasticity of a bilayer surrounding a circular wound, only the interior one being proliferative and contractile. We discuss the occurrence of an irregular wound geometry generated by stresses and show quantitatively that it results from the combined effects of the stiffness, the size of the wound, eventually weakened by actin cables. Comparison of our findings is made with known observations or experiments in vivo.

Indexed as

Wound HealingActinsAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCell ProliferationElasticityEpitheliumMiceModels, BiologicalMyofibroblastsSkinStress, MechanicalActins

Identifiers

PMID25183422
PMCPMC4349964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.