Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25183382›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2014

Drug-induced adverse reactions via breastfeeding: a descriptive study in the French Pharmacovigilance Database.

Caroline Soussan, Aurore Gouraud, Ghyslaine Portolan, Marie-Joseph Jean-Pastor, Caroline Pecriaux, Jean-Louis Montastruc, Christine Damase-Michel, Isabelle Lacroix

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Assessing the Safety of Medications During Lactation: Lactation safety.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Prevalence of Nonserious Events in a Cohort of Breastfed Infants.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Drugs in Lactation.Pharmaceutical research · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline SoussanCHU de Toulouse, Université de Toulouse, Inserm 1027, Toulouse, France.
Aurore Gouraud
Ghyslaine Portolan
Marie-Joseph Jean-Pastor
Caroline Pecriaux
Jean-Louis Montastruc
Christine Damase-Michel
Isabelle Lacroix
Université de Toulouse · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMost drugs are excreted in maternal milk and may therefore be ingested by children during breastfeeding. Data concerning the safety of the use of drugs by breastfeeding women are patchy, and almost nothing is known about this issue for many drugs.

methodsThe aim of this study was to describe the adverse drug reactions of drugs transmitted in breast milk on the basis of the data collected in the French Pharmacovigilance Database. All spontaneous reports of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in breastfed infants recorded in the National Pharmacovigilance Database by the 31 French regional pharmacovigilance centres between 1984 and June 2011 were investigated.

resultsBetween January 1985 and June 2011, 276 adverse drug reactions in 174 breastfed children were notified to the French Pharmacovigilance Network. The most frequently reported adverse drug reactions were neurological (28.6 %) and gastrointestinal (20.3 %). Sixty-five of the adverse drug reactions recorded were considered to be serious (37.4 %). The results of our study confirm that certain drugs were frequently implicated in serious adverse drug reactions. Two cases of ADRs (1.1 %) had a 'certain' causality score (I4) and 13 (7.5 %) a 'likely' score (I3). The suspected drugs include antiepileptic drugs, opiate analgesics and benzodiazepines. These results also demonstrate that some drugs that were thought to be anodyne or for which no data were available, such as ketoprofen and hydroxyzine, may be implicated in adverse effects. Finally, these data show that certain drugs, like pseudoephedrine, which should not be used during breastfeeding, were nevertheless implicated in several of the adverse drug reactions recorded.

conclusionThis study shows that ADR via breastfeeding are rarely reported due to low awareness or low occurrence of ADR via breast milk. These results highlight the need for additional pharmacokinetic, clinical and epidemiological studies, given the paucity of published data. They also demonstrate the need to improve information for the general public about drugs and self-medication during breastfeeding.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAnalgesicsAnticonvulsantsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBenzodiazepinesBreast FeedingChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualFemaleFranceHistamine AntagonistsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePharmacovigilanceAnalgesicsAnticonvulsantsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBenzodiazepinesHistamine Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID25183382
OpenAlexW2091755901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.