ArticleInternational orthopaedics2015
Increased risk of joint failure in hip prostheses infected with Staphylococcus aureus treated with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention compared to Streptococcus.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pathogen-Specific Risk for Iterative Surgical Debridement in Orthopedic Infections: A Prospective Multicohort Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Differences of microbial growth and biofilm formation among periprosthetic joint infection-causing species: an animal study.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025Article
- Clinical outcomes of an unplanned second debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) procedure in acute postoperative prosthetic joint infections.International orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Never mind the bug: no differences in infection-free survival after periprosthetic joint infections withFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Streptococcal and Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infections: are they really different?BMC infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Dair approach in 7 infected total hip arthroplasties: our experience and current concepts of the literature.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2022Review
- Comparison of the success rate after debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) for periprosthetic joint infection among patients with or without a sinus tract.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Article
- Distinct vasculotropic versus osteotropic features of S. agalactiae versus S. aureus implant-associated bone infection in mice.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2021Article
- Direct-Contact Low-Frequency Ultrasound and Pulse Lavage Eradicates Biofilms on Implant Materials In Vitro.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021Article
- Factors affecting outcome in the treatment of streptococcal periprosthetic joint infections: results from a single-centre retrospective cohort study.International orthopaedics · 2021Article
- Calculated parenteral initial treatment of bacterial infections: Bone and joint infections.GMS infectious diseases · 2020Article
- Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention for Early Periprosthetic Infections of the Hip: Outcomes and Influencing Factors.Hip & pelvis · 2019Article
- Pilot study: Internally cooled orthopedic drills - standard sterilization is not enough?Acta clinica Croatica · 2019Article
- Evaluation One Year after DAIR Treatment in 91 Suspected Early Prosthetic Joint Infections in Primary Knee and Hip Arthroplasty.Journal of bone and joint infection · 2019Article
- Treatment of Prosthetic Joint Infection with Debridement, Antibiotics and Irrigation with Implant Retention - a Narrative Review.Journal of bone and joint infection · 2018Review
- Infection after Constrained Condylar Knee Arthroplasty: Incidence and microbiological findings in 100 consecutive complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasties.Journal of bone and joint infection · 2018Article
- Distribution characteristics ofExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2017Article
- Clinical and epidemiological differences between implant-associated and implant-free orthopaedic infections.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2017Article
- Outcome of patients with streptococcal prosthetic joint infections with special reference to rifampicin combinations.BMC infectious diseases · 2016Article
- Aggressive Early Debridement in Treatment of Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infections After Hip and Knee Replacements.The open orthopaedics journal · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe debridement, antibiotic and implant retention (DAIR) procedure is an option for patients with prosthetic hip joint infections for whom arthroplasty removal is problematic. Unfortunately, some of the guidelines proposed for deciding on DAIR management of arthroplasty infections fail to take into consideration the role of the infecting pathogen. While Staphylococcus aureus and streptococci are major contributors to infected hip arthroplasties, their respective contributions to treatment success or failure rates with the DAIR procedure have not been thoroughly analysed from a microbiological perspective.
methodsThis retrospective study included all patients who were hospitalised in Geneva University Hospitals between 1996 and 2012 and were initially treated with DAIR for prosthetic hip joint monomicrobial infection due to S. aureus or Streptococcus spp. The outcome of DAIR treatment was evaluated after a minimal follow-up of two years. A literature search was also performed to retrieve data from additional DAIR-treated cases in other institutions.
resultsIn our institution, 38 DAIR-treated patients with hip arthroplasty monomicrobial infections underwent at least one surgical debridement (median two, range one to five), exchange of mobile parts and concomitant targeted antibiotic therapy for several weeks or months. A literature search identified outcome data in other institutions from 52 additional DAIR-treated cases according to our study criteria. After merging our own data with those retrieved from other reports, we found a failure rate of 21 % instead of 24 % for S. aureus-infected, DAIR-treated patients, but no failure in 14 streptococcal-infected patients. In the pooled data, the failure rate linked with S. aureus infections was significantly higher than that with Streptococcus ssp. (19/90 vs 0/14 episodes; Fisher's exact test, P = 0.07).
conclusionsDAIR-treated patients with prosthetic hip joint infections due to S. aureus tended to have worse outcomes than those infected with Streptococcus spp. The specific influence of the infecting pathogen should be considered in future guidelines and recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.