Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25182971›Full record

SynthesisGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2015

Video-assisted thoracic surgery for pneumothorax: republication of a systematic review and a proposal by the guideline committee of the Japanese association for chest surgery 2014.

Taichiro Goto, Yoshihisa Kadota, Takeshi Mori, Shin-ichi Yamashita, Hirotoshi Horio, Takeshi Nagayasu, Akinori Iwasaki

Abstract readConsensus StatementSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prospective Observation Study for Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax: Incidence of and Risk Factors for Postoperative Neogenesis of Bullae.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2024
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Thoracoscopy for Spontaneous Pneumothorax.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Minimally invasive approach to pneumothorax: Single port or two ports?Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. UniportalJournal of thoracic disease · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Taichiro GotoGuidelines Committees of Japanese Association for Chest Surgery, Kyoto, Japan, taichiro@1997.jukuin.keio.ac.jp.
Yoshihisa Kadota
Takeshi Mori
Shin-ichi Yamashita
Hirotoshi Horio
Takeshi Nagayasu
Akinori Iwasaki
The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery · JPFukuoka University · JPKumamoto University Hospital · JPNagasaki University · JPOsaka Prefectural Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this consensus conference was to determine whether video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) improves clinical outcomes compared with conventional thoracotomy in patients undergoing surgery for pneumothorax, and to outline evidence-based recommendations for the use of VATS.

methodsBefore the consensus conference, the best available evidence was reviewed, with systematic reviews, randomized trials, and nonrandomized trials all taken into consideration in descending order of validity and importance. At the consensus conference, evidence-based interpretative statements were created, and consensus processes were used to determine the ensuing recommendations. The Medical Information Network Distribution Service in Japan (Minds) system was used to label the levels of evidence for the references and the classes of recommendations. RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The consensus panel agreed upon the following statements and recommendations for patients with pneumothorax undergoing surgery: 1. VATS is broadly indicated as surgery for pneumothorax. 2. VATS is judged to be less invasive, as it results in minimal postoperative pain, the periods of chest tube placement and hospitalization are short, and it shows a trend toward early realization of social integration. 3. There is no difference in terms of safety and complications between VATS and open thoracotomy. 4. As it is anticipated that VATS will result in a higher recurrence rate than open thoracotomy, it may be desirable to add a supplemental procedure during surgery. In summary, VATS can be recommended as pneumothorax surgery (Recommendation grade: Level B).

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicHumansJapanPneumothoraxPostoperative PainReview Literature as TopicThoracic SurgeryThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedThoracic Surgical Procedures

Identifiers

PMID25182971
OpenAlexW1967827174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.