Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25182750›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2014

Impact of 11C-choline PET/CT on clinical decision making in recurrent prostate cancer: results from a retrospective two-centre trial.

Francesco Ceci, Ken Herrmann, Paolo Castellucci, Tiziano Graziani, Christina Bluemel, Riccardo Schiavina, Christian Vollmer, Sabine Droll, Eugenio Brunocilla, Renzo Mazzarotto and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 42 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Effect ofFrontiers in medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Salvage Radiotherapy Management Decisions in Postprostatectomy Patients with Recurrent Prostate Cancer Based onJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021
    Trial
  6. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. The Role of Nuclear Medicine in Prostate Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  9. World journal of urology · 2025
    Article
  10. Controversies in the use of next-generation imaging for evaluation and treatment decision-making in patients with prostate cancer after biochemical recurrence: views from a Spanish expert panel.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Scientific reports · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Predictors of prostate bed recurrence on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with rising prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021
    Article
  16. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Article
  17. Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Clinical implications of PET/CT in prostate cancer management.Translational andrology and urology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Francesco CeciService of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy, francesco.ceci83@gmail.com.
Ken Herrmann
Paolo Castellucci
Tiziano Graziani
Christina Bluemel
Riccardo Schiavina
Christian Vollmer
Sabine Droll
Eugenio Brunocilla
Renzo Mazzarotto
Andreas K Buck
Stefano Fanti

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this retrospective two-centre study was to investigate the clinical impact of (11)C-choline PET/CT on treatment management decisions in patients with recurrent prostate cancer (rPCa) after radical therapy.

methodsEnrolled in this retrospective study were 150 patients (95 from Bologna, 55 from Würzburg) with rPCa and biochemical relapse (PSA mean ± SD 4.3 ± 5.5 ng/mL, range 0.2-39.4 ng/mL) after radical therapy. The intended treatment before PET/CT was salvage radiotherapy of the prostatic bed in 95 patients and palliative androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in 55 patients. The effective clinical impact of (11)C-choline PET/CT was rated as major (change in therapeutic approach), minor (same treatment, but modified therapeutic strategy) or none. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis included PSA level, PSA kinetics, ongoing ADT, Gleason score, TNM, age and time to relapse.

resultsChanges in therapy after (11)C-choline PET/CT were implemented in 70 of the 150 patients (46.7%). A major clinical impact was observed in 27 patients (18%) and a minor clinical impact in 43 (28.7%). (11)C-choline PET/CT was positive in 109 patients (72.7%) detecting local relapse (prostate bed and/or iliac lymph nodes and/or pararectal lymph nodes) in 64 patients (42.7%). Distant relapse (paraaortic and/or retroperitoneal lymph nodes and/or bone lesions) was seen in 31 patients (20.7%), and both local and distant relapse in 14 (9.3%). A significant difference was observed in PSA level and PSA kinetics between PET-positive and PET-negative patients (p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, PSA level, PSA doubling time and ongoing ADT were significant predictors of a positive scan (p < 0.05). In statistical analysis no significant differences were observed between the Bologna and Würzburg patients (p > 0.05). In both centres the same criteria to validate PET-positive findings were used: in 17.3% of patients by histology and in 82.7% of patients by correlative imaging and/or clinical follow-up (follow-up mean 20.5 months, median 18.3 months, range 6.2-60 months).

conclusion(11)C-Choline PET/CT had a significant impact on therapeutic management in rPCa patients. It led to an overall change in 46.7% of patients, with a major clinical change implemented in 18% of patients. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the effect of such treatment changes on patient survival.

Indexed as

CholinePositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarbon RadioisotopesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingPredictive Value of TestsProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedCarbon RadioisotopesCholineRadiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.