ArticleJournal of bacteriology2014
Structural and functional characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa global regulator AmpR.
Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non canonical perspectives on AmpR mediated ampC expression in Gram negative bacteria, with particular emphasis on the potential regulatory purview of FtsZ.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- High frequency body site translocation of nosocomial Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Molecular Epidemiology of Carbapenem-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Unique Regulation of Sed-1 β-Lactamase inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Cefepime-taniborbactam activity against antimicrobial-resistant clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: GEARS global surveillance programme 2018-22.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2024Article
- Molecular characterization of clinically isolatedAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024Article
- Characterization of a MHYT domain-coupled transcriptional regulator that responds to carbon monoxide.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Article
- In-depth analysis of Klebsiella aerogenes resistome, virulome and plasmidome worldwide.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Comparative genomics reveals distinct diversification patterns among LysR-type transcriptional regulators in the ESKAPE pathogenMicrobial genomics · 2024Article
- Emergence of ST463Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Bacterial virulence regulation through soluble peptidoglycan fragments sensing and response: knowledge gaps and therapeutic potential.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2023Article
- Article
- The balance between antibiotic resistance and fitness/virulence inFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Cefazolin and imipenem enhance AmpC expression and resistance in NagZ-dependent manner in Enterobacter cloacae complex.BMC microbiology · 2022Article
- β-lactam Resistance inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Genomic Insights into Drug Resistance Determinants inMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Mechanisms of Resistance to Ceftolozane/Tazobactam in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Results of the GERPA Multicenter Study.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021Article
- The Role ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Fluorescence Assessment of the AmpR-Signaling Network ofACS chemical biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a dreaded pathogen in many clinical settings. Its inherent and acquired antibiotic resistance thwarts therapy. In particular, derepression of the AmpC β-lactamase is a common mechanism of β-lactam resistance among clinical isolates. The inducible expression of ampC is controlled by the global LysR-type transcriptional regulator (LTTR) AmpR. In the present study, we investigated the genetic and structural elements that are important for ampC induction. Specifically, the ampC (PampC) and ampR (PampR) promoters and the AmpR protein were characterized. The transcription start sites (TSSs) of the divergent transcripts were mapped using 5' rapid amplification of cDNA ends-PCR (RACE-PCR), and strong σ(54) and σ(70) consensus sequences were identified at PampR and PampC, respectively. Sigma factor RpoN was found to negatively regulate ampR expression, possibly through promoter blocking. Deletion mapping revealed that the minimal PampC extends 98 bp upstream of the TSS. Gel shifts using membrane fractions showed that AmpR binds to PampC in vitro whereas in vivo binding was demonstrated using chromatin immunoprecipitation-quantitative PCR (ChIP-qPCR). Additionally, site-directed mutagenesis of the AmpR helix-turn-helix (HTH) motif identified residues critical for binding and function (Ser38 and Lys42) and critical for function but not binding (His39). Amino acids Gly102 and Asp135, previously implicated in the repression state of AmpR in the enterobacteria, were also shown to play a structural role in P. aeruginosa AmpR. Alkaline phosphatase fusion and shaving experiments suggest that AmpR is likely to be membrane associated. Lastly, an in vivo cross-linking study shows that AmpR dimerizes. In conclusion, a potential membrane-associated AmpR dimer regulates ampC expression by direct binding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.