Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25182487›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2014

Structural and functional characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa global regulator AmpR.

Olivier Caille, Diansy Zincke, Massimo Merighi, Deepak Balasubramanian, Hansi Kumari, Kok-Fai Kong, Eugenia Silva-Herzog, Giri Narasimhan, Lisa Schneper, Stephen Lory and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Unique Regulation of Sed-1 β-Lactamase inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Molecular characterization of clinically isolatedAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Emergence of ST463Microbiology spectrum · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. β-lactam Resistance inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Role ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olivier CailleDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA.
Diansy ZinckeDepartment of Biological Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA.
Massimo MerighiDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Deepak BalasubramanianDepartment of Biological Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA.
Hansi KumariDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA.
Kok-Fai KongDepartment of Biological Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA.
Eugenia Silva-HerzogDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA.
Giri NarasimhanSchool of Computing and Information Science, College of Engineering and Computing, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA.
Lisa SchneperDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA.
Stephen LoryDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Kalai MatheeDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA Kalai.Mathee@fiu.edu.
Florida International University · USHarvard University · US

Funding

MBRS RESEARCH INITIATIVE FOR SCIENTIFIC ENHANCEMENTR25GM061347 · NIGMS · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI LICKLITER, ROBERT E · 2000 to 2016
$14.7M
P. aeruginosa Virulence DeterminantsR37AI021451 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI LORY, STEPHEN · 2005 to 2014
$4.0M
Regulation of P. aeruginosa PoxB Oxacillinase by AmpR and a Two-Component SystemSC1AI081376 · NIAID · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI MATHEE, KALAI · 2008 to 2011
$1.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI021451NIAID NIH HHS SC1 AI081376NIAID NIH HHS SC1AI081376NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM061347NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM61347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a dreaded pathogen in many clinical settings. Its inherent and acquired antibiotic resistance thwarts therapy. In particular, derepression of the AmpC β-lactamase is a common mechanism of β-lactam resistance among clinical isolates. The inducible expression of ampC is controlled by the global LysR-type transcriptional regulator (LTTR) AmpR. In the present study, we investigated the genetic and structural elements that are important for ampC induction. Specifically, the ampC (PampC) and ampR (PampR) promoters and the AmpR protein were characterized. The transcription start sites (TSSs) of the divergent transcripts were mapped using 5' rapid amplification of cDNA ends-PCR (RACE-PCR), and strong σ(54) and σ(70) consensus sequences were identified at PampR and PampC, respectively. Sigma factor RpoN was found to negatively regulate ampR expression, possibly through promoter blocking. Deletion mapping revealed that the minimal PampC extends 98 bp upstream of the TSS. Gel shifts using membrane fractions showed that AmpR binds to PampC in vitro whereas in vivo binding was demonstrated using chromatin immunoprecipitation-quantitative PCR (ChIP-qPCR). Additionally, site-directed mutagenesis of the AmpR helix-turn-helix (HTH) motif identified residues critical for binding and function (Ser38 and Lys42) and critical for function but not binding (His39). Amino acids Gly102 and Asp135, previously implicated in the repression state of AmpR in the enterobacteria, were also shown to play a structural role in P. aeruginosa AmpR. Alkaline phosphatase fusion and shaving experiments suggest that AmpR is likely to be membrane associated. Lastly, an in vivo cross-linking study shows that AmpR dimerizes. In conclusion, a potential membrane-associated AmpR dimer regulates ampC expression by direct binding.

Indexed as

Amino Acid MotifsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-Lactamasesbeta-Lactam Resistancebeta-LactamsChromosome MappingChromosomes, BacterialConsensus SequenceDrug Resistance, BacterialGene Expression Regulation, BacterialPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BindingProtein ConformationPseudomonas aeruginosaAmpC beta-lactamasesAmpR protein, BacteriaAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-Lactamasesbeta-Lactams

Identifiers

PMID25182487
PMCPMC4248820
OpenAlexW1986597981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.