Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25182269›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2014

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a guideline-based stepped care model for patients with depression: study protocol of a cluster-randomized controlled trial in routine care.

Birgit Watzke, Daniela Heddaeus, Maya Steinmann, Hans-Helmut König, Karl Wegscheider, Holger Schulz, Martin Härter

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01731717 nacompletednot on this map

Effektivität Und Effizienz Von Behandlungspfaden für Patienten Mit Depressiven Erkrankungen: Stepped Care Als Ansatz für Ein Leitliniengerechtes Und Integriertes Versorgungsmanagement

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfRan2012 to 2015Enrolled737ConditionsDepressionArmsActive monitoring, Bibliotherapy, Online self-help, Outpatient psychotherapy, Psychiatric treatment
NCT02667366 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Improving Access to Evidence-based Treatment for Depression: Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Telephone-delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ZurichRan2016 to 2019Enrolled56ConditionsDepressionArmsTel-PT, TAU and text messages
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Internet interventions for depression: new developments.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2016
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Birgit Watzke
Daniela Heddaeus
Maya Steinmann
Hans-Helmut König
Karl Wegscheider
Holger Schulz
Martin Härter
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression is a widespread and serious disease often accompanied by a high degree of suffering and burden of disease. The lack of integration between different care providers impedes guideline-based treatment. This constitutes substantial challenges for the health care system and also causes considerable direct and indirect costs. To face these challenges, the aim of this project is the implementation and evaluation of a guideline-based stepped care model for depressed patients with six treatment options of varying intensity and setting, including low-intensity treatments using innovative technologies. METHODS/

designThe study is a randomized controlled intervention trial of a consecutive sample of depressive patients from primary care assessed with a prospective survey at four time-standardized measurement points within one year. A cluster randomization at the level of participating primary care units divides the general practitioners into two groups. In the intervention group patients (n = 660) are treated within the stepped care approach in a multiprofessional network consisting of general practitioners, psychotherapists, psychiatrists and inpatient care facilities, whereas patients in the control condition (n = 200) receive routine care. The main research question concerns the effectiveness of the stepped-care model from baseline to t3 (12 months). Primary outcome is the change in depressive symptoms measured by the PHQ-9; secondary outcomes include response, remission and relapse, functional quality of life (SF-12 and EQ-5D-3 L), other clinical and psychosocial variables, direct and indirect costs, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Furthermore feasibility and acceptance of the overall model as well as of the separate treatment components are assessed. DISCUSSION: This stepped care model integrates all primary and secondary health care providers involved in the treatment of depression; it elaborates innovative and evidence-based treatment elements, follows a stratified approach and is implemented in routine care as opposed to standardized conditions. In case of positive results, its sustainable implementation as a collaborative care model may significantly improve the health care situation of depressive patients as well as the interaction and care delivery of different care providers on various levels.

trial registrationThis study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01731717 (date of registration: 24 June 2013).

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultAgedBibliotherapyCluster AnalysisCognitive Behavioral TherapyCost-Benefit AnalysisDelivery of Health CareDepressive DisorderHumansInternetMiddle AgedMotivationPatient ParticipationPatient Satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID25182269
PMCPMC4243822
OpenAlexW2001241190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.