Trial reportBMC public health2014
Implementation of a universal rotavirus vaccination program: comparison of two delivery systems.
Trial report in BMC public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01273077 (Evaluation of Universal Rotavirus Vaccination Program), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of Universal Rotavirus Vaccination Program
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rotavirus vaccine coverage and factors associated with uptake using linked data: Ontario, Canada.PloS one · 2018Article
- Rotavirus vaccine, breastfeeding, and other factors that could affect susceptibility to gastroenteritis in young children.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2017Article
- A universal infant rotavirus vaccine program in two delivery models: Effectiveness and adverse events following immunization.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2015Article
- A brief educational intervention increases providers' human papillomavirus vaccine knowledge.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRotavirus vaccine is recommended for all infants in Canada. To evaluate the logistics of implementing a universal rotavirus vaccination program, we compared the effectiveness of program implementation in jurisdictions with either a physician-administered or public health nurse-administered program.
methodsAll infants born between October 1, 2010 and September 30, 2012 in Prince Edward Island and Nova Scotia's Capital District Health Authority were eligible for the vaccination program. A universal rotavirus vaccination program was implemented and delivered in public health clinics in Prince Edward Island and in physicians' offices in Nova Scotia.
resultsEngagement of vaccinators in delivery of the universal vaccination program was more successful in Prince Edward Island than in Nova Scotia. Vaccine coverage rates rose rapidly in Prince Edward Island, exceeding 90% for both doses within 3 months and remaining at those levels over the two-year program. In contrast, coverage rates in Nova Scotia rose more slowly and never exceeded 40% during the two years. Access to coverage data was more timely and accurate in Prince Edward Island than Nova Scotia.
conclusionA universal rotavirus vaccination program delivered through public health clinics achieved more rapid and higher levels of coverage than a program administered through physicians' offices.
trial registrationNCT01273077.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.