Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25181945›Full record

ReviewHuman genomics2014

Improved drug therapy: triangulating phenomics with genomics and metabolomics.

Andrew A Monte, Chad Brocker, Daniel W Nebert, Frank J Gonzalez, David C Thompson, Vasilis Vasiliou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin DJournal of cellular physiology · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Proteomics and Metabolomics for Cystic Fibrosis Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Clinical Applications of System Regulation Medicine.Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. The Use of Omic Technologies Applied to Traditional Chinese Medicine Research.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Sharpening Precision Medicine by a Thorough Interrogation of Metabolic Individuality.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2016
    Review
  12. Animal-Free Chemical Safety Assessment.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew A MonteUniversity of Colorado Department of Emergency Medicine, Leprino Building, 7th Floor Campus Box B-215, 12401 E. 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. andrew.monte@ucdenver.edu.
Chad BrockerLaboratory of Metabolism, Center for Cancer Research, National Institute of Cancer, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. chad.brocker@nih.gov.
Daniel W NebertDivision of Human Genetics, Department of Pediatrics and Molecular Developmental Biology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, 45220, USA. dan.nebert@uc.edu.
Frank J GonzalezLaboratory of Metabolism, Center for Cancer Research, National Institute of Cancer, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA. fjgonz@helix.nih.gov.
David C ThompsonSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. David.thompson@ucdenver.edu.
Vasilis VasiliouSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. Vasilis.vasiliou@ucdenver.edu.

Funding

Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001082 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2013 to 2017
$48.0M
REPRODUCTIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICOLOGY RESEARCHP30ES006096 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI PINNEY, SUSAN MENGEL · 1992 to 2022
$35.4M
Xenobiotic ReceptorsZIABC005708 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI GONZALEZ, FRANK J · 2009 to 2025
$16.4M
Mouse Models for Alcohol Metabolism and Tissue InjuryR24AA022057 · NIAAA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI VASILIOU, VASILIS · 2013 to 2022
$4.5M
An Integrated Approach to Personalized MedicineK23GM110516 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI MONTE, ANDREW ALBERT · 2014 to 2016
$588k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001082NEI NIH HHS R01 EY14390NIAAA NIH HHS R24AA022057NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES06096NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM110516NIGMS NIH HHS K23GM110516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embracing the complexity of biological systems has a greater likelihood to improve prediction of clinical drug response. Here we discuss limitations of a singular focus on genomics, epigenomics, proteomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics, or phenomics-highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each individual technique. In contrast, 'systems biology' is proposed to allow clinicians and scientists to extract benefits from each technique, while limiting associated weaknesses by supplementing with other techniques when appropriate. Perfect predictive modeling is not possible, whereas modeling of intertwined phenomic responses using genomic stratification with metabolomic modifications may greatly improve predictive values for drug therapy. We thus propose a novel-integrated approach to personalized medicine that begins with phenomic data, is stratified by genomics, and ultimately refined by metabolomic pathway data. Whereas perfect prediction of efficacy and safety of drug therapy is not possible, improvements can be achieved by embracing the complexity of the biological system. Starting with phenomics, the combination of linking metabolomics to identify common biologic pathways and then stratifying by genomic architecture, might increase predictive values. This systems biology approach has the potential, in specific subsets of patients, to avoid drug therapy that will be either ineffective or unsafe.

Indexed as

Drug TherapyEpigenomicsGenetic Association StudiesGenomicsHumansMetabolomicsPrecision MedicineProteomicsSystems BiologyTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID25181945
PMCPMC4445687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.