Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25181492›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2014

Regular breakfast consumption and type 2 diabetes risk markers in 9- to 10-year-old children in the child heart and health study in England (CHASE): a cross-sectional analysis.

Angela S Donin, Claire M Nightingale, Chris G Owen, Alicja R Rudnicka, Michael R Perkin, Susan A Jebb, Alison M Stephen, Naveed Sattar, Derek G Cook, Peter H Whincup

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Angela S DoninPopulation Health Research Institute, Division of Population Health Sciences and Education, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Claire M NightingalePopulation Health Research Institute, Division of Population Health Sciences and Education, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Chris G OwenPopulation Health Research Institute, Division of Population Health Sciences and Education, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Alicja R RudnickaPopulation Health Research Institute, Division of Population Health Sciences and Education, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Michael R PerkinPopulation Health Research Institute, Division of Population Health Sciences and Education, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Susan A JebbNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Alison M StephenMedical Research Council Human Nutrition Research, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Naveed SattarInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow School of Medicine, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Derek G CookPopulation Health Research Institute, Division of Population Health Sciences and Education, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Peter H WhincupPopulation Health Research Institute, Division of Population Health Sciences and Education, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKChief Scientist OfficeDiabetes UK 11/0004317Medical Research Council G0501295Medical Research Council MC_U105960384Medical Research Council MC_U105960389Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 068362/Z/02/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegular breakfast consumption may protect against type 2 diabetes risk in adults but little is known about its influence on type 2 diabetes risk markers in children. We investigated the associations between breakfast consumption (frequency and content) and risk markers for type 2 diabetes (particularly insulin resistance and glycaemia) and cardiovascular disease in children. METHODS AND

findingsWe conducted a cross-sectional study of 4,116 UK primary school children aged 9-10 years. Participants provided information on breakfast frequency, had measurements of body composition, and gave fasting blood samples for measurements of blood lipids, insulin, glucose, and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). A subgroup of 2,004 children also completed a 24-hour dietary recall. Among 4,116 children studied, 3,056 (74%) ate breakfast daily, 450 (11%) most days, 372 (9%) some days, and 238 (6%) not usually. Graded associations between breakfast frequency and risk markers were observed; children who reported not usually having breakfast had higher fasting insulin (percent difference 26.4%, 95% CI 16.6%-37.0%), insulin resistance (percent difference 26.7%, 95% CI 17.0%-37.2%), HbA1c (percent difference 1.2%, 95% CI 0.4%-2.0%), glucose (percent difference 1.0%, 95% CI 0.0%-2.0%), and urate (percent difference 6%, 95% CI 3%-10%) than those who reported having breakfast daily; these differences were little affected by adjustment for adiposity, socioeconomic status, and physical activity levels. When the higher levels of triglyceride, systolic blood pressure, and C-reactive protein for those who usually did not eat breakfast relative to those who ate breakfast daily were adjusted for adiposity, the differences were no longer significant. Children eating a high fibre cereal breakfast had lower insulin resistance than those eating other breakfast types (p for heterogeneity <0.01). Differences in nutrient intakes between breakfast frequency groups did not account for the differences in type 2 diabetes markers.

conclusionsChildren who ate breakfast daily, particularly a high fibre cereal breakfast, had a more favourable type 2 diabetes risk profile. Trials are needed to quantify the protective effect of breakfast on emerging type 2 diabetes risk. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.

Indexed as

Health StatusBlood GlucoseBreakfastChildCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2EnglandFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID25181492
PMCPMC4151989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.