Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25180815›Full record

ArticleVaccine2014

Parent perceptions important for HPV vaccine initiation among low income adolescent girls.

Stephanie A S Staras, Susan T Vadaparampil, Roshni P Patel, Elizabeth A Shenkman

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Pilot Test of a Workshop for Pediatric Clinicians About Communicating with Parents About the HPV Vaccine Using the C-LEAR Approach.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie A S StarasDepartment of Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Medicine, and The Institute for Child Health Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States. Electronic address: sstaras@ufl.edu.
Susan T VadaparampilHealth Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States; Center for Infection Research in Cancer, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States; Department of Oncologic Science, College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
Roshni P PatelDepartment of Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Medicine, and The Institute for Child Health Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Elizabeth A ShenkmanDepartment of Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Medicine, and The Institute for Child Health Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
University of Florida · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

HIV Risk Among Racially-Diverse, Minority Youth: Alcohol and Partner SelectionK01AA018255 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI STARAS, STEPHANIE A S · 2010 to 2014
$736k
NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA018255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study aims were to assess the influence of provider recommendations on parental vaccine perceptions and identify the most potent parent vaccine perceptions for HPV vaccine series initiation considering provider recommendation strength.

methodsWe administered a questionnaire and assessed HPV vaccine claims among a stratified-random sample of parents of 9-17 year old girls enrolled in Florida's Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program. Using multivariate analyses, we evaluated the associations between: (1) parent vaccine perceptions and provider recommendation strength, and (2) parent vaccine perceptions and HPV vaccine series initiation (≥1 vaccine claim or positive parental report) controlling for provider recommendation strength.

resultsThe majority of the 2422 participating parents agreed that the HPV vaccine was safe (61%), would not make girls more likely to have sex (69%), and prevented cervical cancer (71%). About half (44%) reported receiving a strong provider recommendation. Compared to parents without recommendations, parents with strong recommendations had 2 to 7 times higher odds of agreeing that: vaccines are safe, the HPV vaccine is safe, not concerned about side effects, and the vaccine prevents cervical cancer. Even when considering provider recommendation strength, HPV vaccine series initiation was more likely among girls of parents who agreed rather than disagreed that the HPV vaccine was safe [odds ratio (OR)=5.8, 95% confidence interval (CI)=3.1, 11.1], does not cause sex (OR=2.0, 95% CI=1.2, 3.4), prevents cervical cancer (OR=2.0, 95% CI=1.0, 3.4), and prevents HPV infections (OR=1.8, 95% CI=1.0, 3.0).

conclusionsParent concerns about HPV vaccine are similar to their concerns about other vaccines. Providers should focus HPV vaccine discussions with parents on vaccine safety and illness prevention.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentChildFemaleHumansPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesParentsPovertySexual BehaviorUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaccinationPapillomavirus VaccinesAdolescentsHPVParent attitudesProvider recommendationsVaccine

Identifiers

PMID25180815
PMCPMC4198149
OpenAlexW2062067973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.