SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2014
Topical corticosteroids for treating phimosis in boys.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Topical corticosteroids for treating phimosis in boys.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Diagnosis and management of bladder bowel dysfunction in children with urinary tract infections: a position statement from the International Children's Continence Society.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2018Pooled it
- Effectiveness of low to moderate potency topical corticosteroids for phimosis resolution in children: results of a network meta-analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2025Review
- [Topical corticosteroids for the treatment of pediatric phimosis].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Phimosis in Adults: Narrative Review of the New Available Devices and the Standard Treatments.Clinics and practice · 2024Review
- Availability of evidence and comparative effectiveness for surgical versus drug interventions: an overview of systematic reviews.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- The efficacy of topical 0.1% mometasone furoate for treating symptomatic severe phimosis: A comparison of two treatment regimens.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Efficacy of topical steroid treatment in children with severe phimosis in China: A long-term single centre prospective study.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2021Article
- Can circumcision be avoided in adult male with phimosis? Results of the PhimoStopTranslational andrology and urology · 2021Article
- Topical corticosteroids for phimosis in children: a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Pediatric surgery international · 2021Article
- Balanitis xerotica obliterans: an update for clinicians.European journal of pediatrics · 2020Review
- Urinary Tract Infection in Children.Recent patents on inflammation & allergy drug discovery · 2019Article
- Newborn male circumcision.Paediatrics & child healthArticle
- Outcome of topical steroid application in children with non-retractile prepuce.Developmental period medicineObservational
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUntil recently, phimosis has been treated surgically by circumcision or prepuceplasty; however, recent reports of non-invasive treatment using topical corticosteroids applied for four to eight weeks have been favourable. The efficacy and safety of topical corticosteroids for treating phimosis in boys has not been previously systematically reviewed.
objectivesWe aimed to 1) compare the effectiveness of the use of topical corticosteroid ointment applied to the distal stenotic portion of the prepuce in the resolution of phimosis in boys compared with the use of placebo or no treatment, and 2) determine the rate of partial resolution (improvement) of phimosis, rate of re-stenosis after initial resolution or improvement of phimosis, and the rate of adverse events of topical corticosteroid treatment in boys with phimosis. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register through contact with the Trials' Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review. Date of last search: 16 June 2014. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared use of any topical corticosteroid ointment with placebo ointment or no treatment for boys with phimosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed titles, abstracts and the full-text of eligible studies, extracted data relating to the review's primary and secondary outcomes, and assessed studies' risk of bias. Statistical analyses were performed using the random-effects model and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We contacted authors of primary articles asking for details of study design and specific outcome data. MAIN
resultsWe included 12 studies that enrolled 1395 boys in this review. We found that both types of corticosteroids investigated and treatment duration varied among studies.Compared with placebo, corticosteroids significantly increased complete or partial clinical resolution of phimosis (12 studies, 1395 participants: RR 2.45, 95% CI 1.84 to 3.26). Our analysis of studies that compared different types of corticosteroids found that these therapies also significantly increased complete clinical resolution of phimosis (8 studies, 858 participants: RR 3.42, 95% CI 2.08 to 5.62). Although nine studies (978 participants) reported that assessment of adverse effects were planned in the study design, these outcomes were not reported.Overall, we found that inadequate reporting made assessing risk of bias challenging in many of the included studies.Selection bias, performance and detection bias was unclear in the majority of the included studies: two studies had adequate sequence generation, none reported allocation concealment; two studies had adequate blinding of participants and personnel and one had high risk of bias; one study blinded outcome assessors. Attrition bias was low in 8/12 studies and reporting bias was unclear in 11 studies and high in one study. AUTHORS'
conclusionsTopical corticosteroids offer an effective alternative for treating phimosis in boys. Although sub optimal reporting among the included studies meant that the size of the effect remains uncertain, corticosteroids appear to be a safe, less invasive first-line treatment option before undertaking surgery to correct phimosis in boys.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.