Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25180516›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2014

The effect of prophylactic antipyretic administration on post-vaccination adverse reactions and antibody response in children: a systematic review.

Rashmi Ranjan Das, Inusha Panigrahi, Sushree Samiksha Naik

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02807623 ("Do NSAIDS or Executing Exercise Decrease Local Erythema, Site Swelling & Pain After INoculation), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02807623 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

"Do NSAIDS or Executing Exercise Decrease Local Erythema, Site Swelling & Pain After INoculation: the NEED LESS PAIN Study"

TypeinterventionalSponsorWomack Army Medical CenterRan2016 to 2018Enrolled300ConditionsImmune System and Related DisordersArmsIbuprofen, Compound Exercise of Push-ups, oral placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Misuse of Antipyretic Amid Fear of COVID-19 Vaccine.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rashmi Ranjan DasDepartment of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Inusha PanigrahiDepartment of Pediatrics, Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Sushree Samiksha NaikDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar · INPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INSriram Chandra Bhanja Medical College Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProphylactic antipyretic administration decreases the post-vaccination adverse reactions. Recent study finds that they may also decrease the antibody responses to several vaccine antigens. This systematic review aimed to assess the evidence for a relationship between prophylactic antipyretic administration, post-vaccination adverse events, and antibody response in children.

methodsA systematic search of major databases including MEDLINE and EMBASE was carried out till March 2014. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing prophylactic antipyretic treatment versus placebo post-vaccination in children ≤ 6 years of age were included. Two reviewers independently applied eligibility criteria, assessed the studies for methodological quality, and extracted data [PROSPERO registration: CRD42014009717].

resultsOf 2579 citations retrieved, a total of 13 RCTs including 5077 children were included in the review. Prophylactic antipyretic administration significantly reduced the febrile reactions (≥ 38.0 °C) after primary and booster vaccinations. Though there were statistically significant differences in the antibody responses between the two groups, the prophylactic PCM group had what would be considered protective levels of antibodies to all of the antigens given after the primary and booster vaccinations. No significant difference in the nasopharyngeal carriage rates (short-term and long-term) of H. influenzae or S. pneumoniae serotypes was found between the prophylactic and no prophylactic PCM group. There was a significant reduction in the local and systemic symptoms after primary, but not booster vaccinations.

conclusionsThough prophylactic antipyretic administration leads to relief of the local and systemic symptoms after primary vaccinations, there is a reduction in antibody responses to some vaccine antigens without any effect on the nasopharyngeal carriage rates of S. pneumoniae & H. influenza serotypes. Future trials and surveillance programs should also aim at assessing the effectiveness of programs where prophylactic administration of PCM is given. The timing of administration of antipyretics should be discussed with the parents after explaining the benefits & risks.

Indexed as

AntibodiesAntipyreticsChildHumansTreatment OutcomeVaccinationAntibodiesAntipyretics

Identifiers

PMID25180516
PMCPMC4152293
OpenAlexW2118054413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.