Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25180312›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2015

Comparative effectiveness of risperidone long-acting injectable vs first-generation antipsychotic long-acting injectables in schizophrenia: results from a nationwide, retrospective inception cohort study.

Jimmi Nielsen, Signe O W Jensen, Rasmus B Friis, Jan B Valentin, Christoph U Correll

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Poly(ethylene glycol)-Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. First-generationTherapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2018
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. The Use of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia.Current treatment options in psychiatry · 2017
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jimmi NielsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark; Aalborg University Hospital, Psychiatry, Aalborg, Denmark; jin@rn.dk.
Signe O W JensenAalborg University Hospital, Psychiatry, Aalborg, Denmark;
Rasmus B FriisAalborg University Hospital, Psychiatry, Aalborg, Denmark;
Jan B ValentinAalborg University Hospital, Psychiatry, Aalborg, Denmark;
Christoph U CorrellThe Zucker Hillside Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, Glen Oaks, NY; Hofstra North Shore LIJ School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY.
Aalborg University Hospital · DKAalborg University · DKHofstra University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare in a generalizable sample/setting objective outcomes in patients receiving first-generation antipsychotic long-acting injectables (FGA-LAIs) or risperidone-LAI (RIS-LAI).

methodsNationwide, retrospective inception cohort study of adults with International Classification of Diseases-10 schizophrenia using Danish registers from 1995 to 2009 comparing outcomes between clinician's/patient's choice treatment with FGA-LAIs or RIS-LAI. Primary outcome was time to psychiatric hospitalization using Cox-regression adjusting for relevant covariates. Secondary outcomes included time to all-cause discontinuation and psychiatric hospitalization in patients without LAI possession gap >28 days, and number of bed-days after psychiatric hospitalization.

resultsAmong 4532 patients followed for 2700 patient-years, 2078 received RIS-LAI and 2454 received FGA-LAIs (zuclopenthixol decanoate = 52.2%, perphenazine decanoate = 37.2%, haloperidol decanoate = 5.0%, flupenthixol decanoate = 4.4%, fluphenazine decanoate = 1.3%). RIS-LAI was similar to FGA-LAIs regarding time to hospitalization (RIS-LAI = 246.2±323.7 days vs FGA-LAIs = 276.6±383.3 days; HR = 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.87-1.03, P = 0.199) and time to all-cause discontinuation (RIS-LAI = 245.8±324.0 days vs FGA-LAIs = 287.0±390.9 days; HR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.86-1.02, P = 0.116). Similarly, in patients without LAI discontinuation, RIS-LAI and FGA-LAIs did not differ regarding time to hospitalization (RIS-LAI = 175.0±268.1 days vs FGA-LAIs = 210.7±325.3 days; HR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.86-1.04, P = 0.254). Finally, duration of hospitalization was also similar (incidence rate ratio = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.78-1.19, P = 0.744). Results were unchanged when analyzing only patients treated after introduction of RIS-LAI.

conclusionsIn this nationwide cohort study, RIS-LAI was not superior to FGA-LAIs regarding time to psychiatric hospitalization, all-cause discontinuation, and duration of hospitalization. Given the cost of hospitalization and second-generation antipsychotic (SGA)-LAIs, these findings require consideration when making treatment choices, but also need to be balanced with the individual relevance of adverse effects/patient centered outcomes. In future, head-to-head trials and additional nationwide database studies including other SGA-LAIs is needed.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareRegistriesAdultAntipsychotic AgentsDecanoatesDelayed-Action PreparationsDenmarkFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitalizationHumansInjectionsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisperidoneAntipsychotic AgentsDecanoatesDelayed-Action PreparationsRisperidoneall-cause discontinuationcohort studyfirst-generation antipsychoticshospitalizationlong-acting injectablerisperidoneschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID25180312
PMCPMC4393684
OpenAlexW2101113782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.