Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25180291›Full record

ArticleThe Annals of occupational hygiene2015

Historical occupational trichloroethylene air concentrations based on inspection measurements from Shanghai, China.

Melissa C Friesen, Sarah J Locke, Yu-Cheng Chen, Joseph B Coble, Patricia A Stewart, Bu-Tian Ji, Bryan Bassig, Wei Lu, Shouzheng Xue, Wong-Ho Chow and 4 more

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in The Annals of occupational hygiene, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Melissa C Friesen1.Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7240, USA friesenmc@mail.nih.gov.
Sarah J Locke1.Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7240, USA.
Yu-Cheng Chen1.Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7240, USA.
Joseph B Coble1.Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7240, USA.
Patricia A Stewart1.Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7240, USA 2.Stewart Exposure Assessments, LLC , Arlington, VA 22207, USA.
Bu-Tian Ji1.Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7240, USA.
Bryan Bassig1.Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7240, USA.
Wei Lu3.Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control, 1380 Zhongshan Road, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Shouzheng Xue1.Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7240, USA.
Wong-Ho Chow1.Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7240, USA 4.Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Qing Lan1.Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7240, USA.
Mark P Purdue1.Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7240, USA.
Nathaniel Rothman1.Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7240, USA.
Roel Vermeulen5.Environmental and Occupational Health Division, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

Occupational Exposure AssessmentZIACP010122 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI FRIESEN, MELISSA · 2009 to 2025
$8.6M
STUDIES OF OCCUPATIONAL CANCER--OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE ASSESSMENTZ01CP010122 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI DOSEMECI, MUSTAFA · 1996 to 2008
$83k
Intramural NIH HHSNCI NIH HHS Z01 CP10122-19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTrichloroethylene (TCE) is a carcinogen that has been linked to kidney cancer and possibly other cancer sites including non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Its use in China has increased since the early 1990s with China's growing metal, electronic, and telecommunications industries. We examined historical occupational TCE air concentration patterns in a database of TCE inspection measurements collected in Shanghai, China to identify temporal trends and broad contrasts among occupations and industries.

methodsUsing a database of 932 short-term, area TCE air inspection measurements collected in Shanghai worksites from 1968 through 2000 (median year 1986), we developed mixed-effects models to evaluate job-, industry-, and time-specific TCE air concentrations.

resultsModels of TCE air concentrations from Shanghai work sites predicted that exposures decreased 5-10% per year between 1968 and 2000. Measurements collected near launderers and dry cleaners had the highest predicted geometric means (GM for 1986 = 150-190 mg m(-3)). The majority (53%) of the measurements were collected in metal treatment jobs. In a model restricted to measurements in metal treatment jobs, predicted GMs for 1986 varied 35-fold across industries, from 11 mg m(-3) in 'other metal products/repair' industries to 390 mg m(-3) in 'ships/aircrafts' industries.

conclusionsTCE workplace air concentrations appeared to have dropped over time in Shanghai, China between 1968 and 2000. Understanding differences in TCE concentrations across time, occupations, and industries may assist future epidemiologic studies in China.

Indexed as

Air Pollutants, OccupationalCarcinogensChinaDatabases, FactualEnvironmental MonitoringHistory, 20th CenturyHumansMetalsModels, StatisticalOccupational ExposureSolventsTime FactorsTrichloroethyleneWorkplaceAir Pollutants, OccupationalCarcinogensMetalsSolventsTrichloroethyleneChinaoccupational exposurespopulation-based studiesstatistical modeltrichloroethylene

Identifiers

PMID25180291
PMCPMC4290627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.