Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25180161›Full record

ReviewInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife2014

Co-invaders: The effects of alien parasites on native hosts.

Alan J Lymbery, Mikayla Morine, Hosna Gholipour Kanani, Stephen J Beatty, David L Morgan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
21.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 370 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Parasite co-invasion by northern pike (International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The spread of non-native species.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Description of helminthic fauna ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Alan J LymberyFreshwater Fish Group and Fish Health Unit, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch 6150, Western Australia, Australia.
Mikayla MorineFreshwater Fish Group and Fish Health Unit, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch 6150, Western Australia, Australia.
Hosna Gholipour KananiFreshwater Fish Group and Fish Health Unit, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch 6150, Western Australia, Australia ; Fisheries Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Gonbad Kavous University, Iran.
Stephen J BeattyFreshwater Fish Group and Fish Health Unit, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch 6150, Western Australia, Australia.
David L MorganFreshwater Fish Group and Fish Health Unit, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch 6150, Western Australia, Australia.
Murdoch University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We define co-introduced parasites as those which have been transported with an alien host to a new locality, outside of their natural range, and co-invading parasites as those which have been co-introduced and then spread to new, native hosts. Of 98 published studies of co-introductions, over 50% of hosts were freshwater fishes and 49% of parasites were helminths. Although we would expect parasites with simple, direct life cycles to be much more likely to be introduced and establish in a new locality, a substantial proportion (36%) of co-introductions were of parasites with an indirect life cycle. Seventy-eight per cent of co-introduced parasites were found in native host species and can therefore be classed as co-invaders. Host switching was equally common among parasites with direct and indirect life cycles. The magnitude of the threat posed to native species by co-invaders will depend, among other things, on parasite virulence. In 16 cases where co-introduced parasites have switched to native hosts and information was available on relative virulence, 14 (85%) were more virulent in native hosts than in the co-introduced alien host. We argue that this does not necessarily support the naïve host theory that co-invading parasites will have greater pathogenic effects in native hosts with which they have no coevolutionary history, but may instead be a consequence of the greater likelihood for parasites with lower virulence in their natural host to be co-introduced.

Indexed as

Co-introductionCo-invasionHost-switchingInvasive speciesVirulence

Identifiers

PMID25180161
PMCPMC4145144
OpenAlexW2115154037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.