Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25179916›Full record

Trial reportClinical pharmacokinetics2014

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of single ascending doses of RCT-18 in Chinese patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Xia Chen, Yong Hou, Ji Jiang, Qian Zhao, Wen Zhong, Wenxiang Wang, Xuejing Yao, Lin Li, Jianmin Fang, Fengchun Zhang and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Telitacicept for autoimmune nephropathy.Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xia ChenClinical Pharmacology Research Centre, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 41 Damucang Alley, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100032, China, chenxia@pumch.cn.
Yong Hou
Ji Jiang
Qian Zhao
Wen Zhong
Wenxiang Wang
Xuejing Yao
Lin Li
Jianmin Fang
Fengchun Zhang
Pei Hu
Peking Union Medical College Hospital · CNTongji University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesRCT-18 is a novel recombinant fusion protein that targets and neutralizes B-lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) and a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL). This first in-human study investigated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and pharmacodynamics of RCT-18 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

methodsThis was a single-center, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study in 28 RA patients. Eligible patients were randomized 3:1 to receive single subcutaneous doses of RCT-18 (1.2, 6, 18, 60, 180, 360, 540 mg) or placebo. A 71-day observation period was scheduled for each patient, during which serial blood sampling for pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and immunogenicity assessments was performed. Safety was assessed throughout the study.

resultsRCT-18 was well tolerated, although mild infections and skin irritation occurred more frequently in patients receiving this drug. After single-dose RCT-18, the maximal serum concentration (C max) of total and free RCT-18 was reached within 1-2 days, followed by a multi-exponential decline. Mean elimination half-life for total RCT-18 and free RCT-18 was 5.7-12.8 days and 3.2-11.3 days at 6-60 mg, and 15.1-17.5 days and 18.8-36.8 days with 180-540 mg RCT-18. The formation and elimination of BLyS-RCT-18 complex were much slower, with a time to C max of 5-29 days and the elimination half-life mounting from 13.3 to 32.8 days with dose escalation. No positive reaction was detected in the immunogenicity assessments. Substantial IgM reduction was only evidenced with 540 mg RCT-18, while the response profiles of IgM/IgG were distinguishable from placebo after 180, 360, or 540 mg RCT-18.

conclusionRCT-18 was safe and well tolerated up to 540-mg single doses. The serum exposure of total and free RCT-18 is linearly correlated to the weight-normalized doses of RCT-18 in dose groups receiving 180-540 mg RCT-18. The elimination half-life of BLyS-RCT-18 increased with RCT-18 doses, suggesting a shift from target-mediated disposition in 1.2-18 mg RCT-18 groups to non-specific clearance in 60-540 mg RCT-18 groups. Assuming the concentration of BLyS-RCT-18 complex and the IgM/IgG ratio are surrogate biomarkers for clinical effects of RCT-18, the dose-response relationship suggests 180-540 mg are pharmacodynamically effective doses in RCT-18 for RA patients, but the effect profile of 540 mg RCT-18 on IgM is similar to that of atacicept at pharmacodynamically effective but clinically ineffective doses.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedArea Under CurveArthritis, RheumatoidBody WeightChinaDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHalf-LifeHumansImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MMaleMiddle AgedImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MRCT-18 fusion proteinRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTransmembrane Activator and CAML Interactor Protein

Identifiers

PMID25179916
OpenAlexW1966803927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.