Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25179432›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2014

CD160 isoforms and regulation of CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses.

Mohamed El-Far, Charles Pellerin, Louise Pilote, Jean-Francois Fortin, Ivan A D Lessard, Yoav Peretz, Elizabeth Wardrop, Patrick Salois, Richard C Bethell, Michael G Cordingley and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Human Hepatic CD56Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  9. Expanded antigen-experienced CD160Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Not All Immune Checkpoints Are Created Equal.Frontiers in immunology · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mohamed El-FarBoehringer Ingelheim Ltd,, 2100 Rue Cunard, Laval, Quebec, Canada. mohamed.el-far@hotmail.com.
Charles Pellerin
Louise Pilote
Jean-Francois Fortin
Ivan A D Lessard
Yoav Peretz
Elizabeth Wardrop
Patrick Salois
Richard C Bethell
Michael G Cordingley
George Kukolj
Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) · CACaprion (Canada) · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoexpression of CD160 and PD-1 on HIV-specific CD8+ T-cells defines a highly exhausted T-cell subset. CD160 binds to Herpes Virus Entry Mediator (HVEM) and blocking this interaction with HVEM antibodies reverses T-cell exhaustion. As HVEM binds both inhibitory and activatory receptors, our aim in the current study was to assess the impact of CD160-specific antibodies on the enhancement of T-cell activation.

methodsExpression of the two CD160 isoforms; glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored (CD160-GPI) and the transmembrane isoforms (CD160-TM) was assessed in CD4 and CD8 primary T-cells by quantitative RT-PCR and Flow-cytometry. Binding of these isoforms to HVEM ligand and the differential capacities of CD160 and HVEM specific antibodies to inhibit this binding were further evaluated using a Time-Resolved Fluorescence assay (TRF). The impact of both CD160 and HVEM specific antibodies on enhancing T-cell functionality upon antigenic stimulation was performed in comparative ex vivo studies using primary cells from HIV-infected subjects stimulated with HIV antigens in the presence or absence of blocking antibodies to the key inhibitory receptor PD-1.

resultsWe first show that both CD160 isoforms, CD160-GPI and CD160-TM, were expressed in human primary CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells. The two isoforms were also recognized by the HVEM ligand, although this binding was less pronounced with the CD160-TM isoform. Mechanistic studies revealed that although HVEM specific antibodies blocked its binding to CD160-GPI, surprisingly, these antibodies enhanced HVEM binding to CD160-TM, suggesting that potential antibody-mediated HVEM multimerization and/or induced conformational changes may be required for optimal CD160-TM binding. Triggering of CD160-GPI over-expressed on Jurkat cells with either bead-bound HVEM-Fc or anti-CD160 monoclonal antibodies enhanced cell activation, consistent with a positive co-stimulatory role for CD160-GPI. However, CD160-TM did not respond to this stimulation, likely due to the lack of optimal HVEM binding. Finally, ex vivo assays using PBMCs from HIV viremic subjects showed that the use of CD160-GPI-specific antibodies combined with blockade of PD-1 synergistically enhanced the proliferation of HIV-1 specific CD8+ T-cells upon antigenic stimulation.

conclusionsAntibodies targeting CD160-GPI complement the blockade of PD-1 to enhance HIV-specific T-cell responses and warrant further investigation in the development of novel immunotherapeutic approaches.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsAntigens, CDCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCHO CellsCricetinaeCricetulusGPI-Linked ProteinsHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansJurkat CellsLymphocyte ActivationMaleProtein BindingAntigens, CDCD160 protein, humanGPI-Linked ProteinsProtein IsoformsReceptors, ImmunologicReceptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Member 14TNFRSF14 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25179432
PMCPMC4163173
OpenAlexW2147911563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.