Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25179352›Full record

ReviewOrthopaedic surgery2014

Minimally invasive percutaneous fixation techniques for metastatic spinal disease.

Prashanth J Rao, Ganesha K Thayaparan, Jacob M Fairhall, Ralph J Mobbs

Open access · greenAbstract readCase ReportsEvaluation StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopaedic surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Application of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Guidance in Lumbar Transforaminal Endoscopic Surgery for Puncture and Catheterization.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. How do vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty affect the quality of life of patients with multiple myeloma spinal metastasis?European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Bone Pain and Muscle Weakness in Cancer Patients.Current osteoporosis reports · 2017
    Review
  20. Evaluation of the relevance of surgery in a retrospective case series of patients who underwent the surgical treatment of a symptomatic spine metastasis from lung cancer.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Prashanth J RaoNeurospine Clinic, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia; University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Ganesha K Thayaparan
Jacob M Fairhall
Ralph J Mobbs
UNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSurgical treatment of spinal metastasis is generally a palliative procedure. Although minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques are supposedly less morbid than open techniques, there is a lack of stratification of MIS techniques based on anticipated longevity. A simple stratification into three percutaneous surgical techniques based on modified Tokuhashi score is here proposed.

methodsPatients recommended for spinal surgery for metastatic spinal disease between 2009 and 2012 and operated on by the senior author (RJM) were retrospectively reviewed. One of three MIS techniques was offered based on estimated survival using a modified Tokuhashi score. Technique #1 is suitable for patients with predicted short longevity (<6 months). Using a mini-open midline or paramedian decompression and percutaneous screw fixation, the goal here is for rapid mobilization and minimization of hospitalization. Technique #2 is suitable for patients with predicted medium longevity (6-12 months). They are suitable for decompression and/or cement vertebral body replacement and a two levels stabilization. Technique #3 is suitable for patients with predicted long term survival survival (>12 months). In these patients, the primary goal of surgery is a wide local or marginal resection of tumor, decompression of the neurological elements and a robust stabilization construct. They are suitable for an open 360°decompression, vertebral body reconstruction and a multilevel stabilization.

resultsThe study included eight patients with a mean age of 59 years (range, 36-72 years). Mean modified Tokuhashi score was 10 (range, 7-13) with three patients in the short term, two in the medium term and three in the long term survival category. Mean blood loss was 700 mL (range, 100-1200 mL), mean operating time 280 min (range, 120-360 min) and length of stay in the hospital was on average 13 days (range, 3-30 days).

conclusionThe authors present three minimally invasive technique options for the management of spinal metastatic disease corresponding to three clinical prognostic categories. In this small series, MIS techniques resulted in speedy recovery, minimal morbidity and no mortality.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBone ScrewsDecompression, SurgicalFemaleHumansLaminectomyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPalliative CarePrognosisRetrospective StudiesSpinal Cord CompressionSpinal FusionMetastasesMinimally invasiveMorbidityPercutaneousSpine

Identifiers

PMID25179352
PMCPMC6583470
OpenAlexW1917920120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.