Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25179226›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of aging2015

Genetic background influences age-related decline in visual and nonvisual retinal responses, circadian rhythms, and sleep.

Gareth Banks, Ines Heise, Becky Starbuck, Tamzin Osborne, Laura Wisby, Paul Potter, Ian J Jackson, Russell G Foster, Stuart N Peirson, Patrick M Nolan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of aging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Shift work-like patterns effect on female and male mouse behavior.Neurobiology of sleep and circadian rhythms · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Zfhx3 modulates retinal sensitivity and circadian responses to light.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gareth BanksMRC Harwell, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Oxfordshire, UK.
Ines HeiseMRC Harwell, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Oxfordshire, UK.
Becky StarbuckMRC Harwell, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Oxfordshire, UK.
Tamzin OsborneMRC Harwell, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Oxfordshire, UK.
Laura WisbyMRC Harwell, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Oxfordshire, UK.
Paul PotterMRC Harwell, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Oxfordshire, UK.
Ian J JacksonMRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC IGMM, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Russell G FosterNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology (Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences), University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Stuart N PeirsonNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology (Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences), University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Patrick M NolanMRC Harwell, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Oxfordshire, UK. Electronic address: p.nolan@har.mrc.ac.uk.
Mary Lyon Centre at MRC Harwell · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBWestern General Hospital · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I021086/1Medical Research Council MC_PC_U127561112Medical Research Council MC_U127561112Medical Research Council MC_U142684172Medical Research Council MC_U142684173Wellcome Trust 098461Wellcome Trust 098461/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The circadian system is entrained to the environmental light/dark cycle via retinal photoreceptors and regulates numerous aspects of physiology and behavior, including sleep. These processes are all key factors in healthy aging showing a gradual decline with age. Despite their importance, the exact mechanisms underlying this decline are yet to be fully understood. One of the most effective tools we have to understand the genetic factors underlying these processes are genetically inbred mouse strains. The most commonly used reference mouse strain is C57BL/6J, but recently, resources such as the International Knockout Mouse Consortium have started producing large numbers of mouse mutant lines on a pure genetic background, C57BL/6N. Considering the substantial genetic diversity between mouse strains we expect there to be phenotypic differences, including differential effects of aging, in these and other strains. Such differences need to be characterized not only to establish how different mouse strains may model the aging process but also to understand how genetic background might modify age-related phenotypes. To ascertain the effects of aging on sleep/wake behavior, circadian rhythms, and light input and whether these effects are mouse strain-dependent, we have screened C57BL/6J, C57BL/6N, C3H-HeH, and C3H-Pde6b+ mouse strains at 5 ages throughout their life span. Our data show that sleep, circadian, and light input parameters are all disrupted by the aging process. Moreover, we have cataloged a number of strain-specific aging effects, including the rate of cataract development, decline in the pupillary light response, and changes in sleep fragmentation and the proportion of time spent asleep.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsCircadian RhythmMice, Inbred C3HMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred StrainsPhotoreceptor Cells, VertebrateSleepVisual AcuityAgingCircadianLight inputMouse strainSleep

Identifiers

PMID25179226
PMCPMC4270439
OpenAlexW2104028323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.