Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25179219›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2014

Analysis of genes contributing to plant-beneficial functions in Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria and related Proteobacteria.

Maxime Bruto, Claire Prigent-Combaret, Daniel Muller, Yvan Moënne-Loccoz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed
19.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 296 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Complete genome sequence of an endophytic bacteriumMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. A stable 15-member bacterial SynCom promotesFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  17. Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maxime Bruto1] Université de Lyon, F-69622, Lyon, France [2] Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France [3] CNRS, UMR5557, Ecologie Microbienne, Villeurbanne, France.
Claire Prigent-Combaret1] Université de Lyon, F-69622, Lyon, France [2] Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France [3] CNRS, UMR5557, Ecologie Microbienne, Villeurbanne, France.
Daniel Muller1] Université de Lyon, F-69622, Lyon, France [2] Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France [3] CNRS, UMR5557, Ecologie Microbienne, Villeurbanne, France.
Yvan Moënne-Loccoz1] Université de Lyon, F-69622, Lyon, France [2] Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France [3] CNRS, UMR5557, Ecologie Microbienne, Villeurbanne, France.
Ecologie Microbienne Lyon · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The positive effects of root-colonizing bacteria cooperating with plants lead to improved growth and/or health of their eukaryotic hosts. Some of these Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) display several plant-beneficial properties, suggesting that the accumulation of the corresponding genes could have been selected in these bacteria. Here, this issue was targeted using 23 genes contributing directly or indirectly to established PGPR effects, based on genome sequence analysis of 304 contrasted Alpha- Beta- and Gammaproteobacteria. Most of the 23 genes studied were also found in non-PGPR Proteobacteria and none of them were common to all 25 PGPR genomes studied. However, ancestral character reconstruction indicated that gene transfers -predominantly ancient- resulted in characteristic gene combinations according to taxonomic subgroups of PGPR strains. This suggests that the PGPR-plant cooperation could have established separately in various taxa, yielding PGPR strains that use different gene assortments. The number of genes contributing to plant-beneficial functions increased along the continuum -animal pathogens, phytopathogens, saprophytes, endophytes/symbionts, PGPR- indicating that the accumulation of these genes (and possibly of different plant-beneficial traits) might be an intrinsic PGPR feature. This work uncovered preferential associations occurring between certain genes contributing to phytobeneficial traits and provides new insights into the emergence of PGPR bacteria.

Indexed as

Plant DevelopmentPlant RootsPlantsProteobacteriaSoil Microbiology

Identifiers

PMID25179219
PMCPMC4151105
OpenAlexW1984827043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.