Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25179217›Full record

ReviewDrug and alcohol dependence2014

Buprenorphine maintenance and mu-opioid receptor availability in the treatment of opioid use disorder: implications for clinical use and policy.

Mark K Greenwald, Sandra D Comer, David A Fiellin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Buprenorphine for Chronic Pain: a Systemic Review.Current pain and headache reports · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Perioperative Management of Patients on Buprenorphine.Current pain and headache reports · 2026
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mark K GreenwaldDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, School of Medicine, and Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Tolan Park Medical Building, Suite 2A, 3901 Chrysler Service Drive, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. Electronic address: mgreen@med.wayne.edu.
Sandra D ComerDivision on Substance Abuse, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
David A FiellinDepartment of Internal Medicine Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Columbia University · USEugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences · USYale University · US

Funding

Using Coincidence Analysis to Investigate Factors Affecting PrEP Initiation and Continuation in Southern ending the Epidemic CountiesP30MH062294 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John Edward Pachankis · 2001 to 2026
$48.5M
PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF MARIJUANA DEPENDENCEP50DA009236 · NIDA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI KLEBER, HERBERT DAVID · 1994 to 2013
$39.4M
Biobehavioral Studies of Opioid Seeking: Effects of Buprenorphine/Naloxone Dose on Experimental Stress Reactivity and Opioid AbstinenceR01DA015462 · NIDA · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GREENWALD, MARK K · 2003 to 2019
$5.5M
Prescription Opioid Effects in Drug and Non-drug AbusersR01DA016759 · NIDA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI COMER, SANDRA D · 2003 to 2014
$5.0M
Models of SBIRT for Opioid Dependent Patients in the Emergency DepartmentR01DA025991 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI D'ONOFRIO, GAIL, FIELLIN, DAVID · 2008 to 2012
$4.8M
Using the VACS Index to track health outcomes associated with changes in drug useR01DA035616 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI FIELLIN, DAVID, JUSTICE, AMY CAROLINE · 2013 to 2015
$1.2M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA009236NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA09236NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015462NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA016759NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA025991NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA035616NIDA NIH HHS R01DA16759NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH062294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSublingual formulations of buprenorphine (BUP) and BUP/naloxone have well-established pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, and are safe and effective for treating opioid use disorder. Since approvals of these formulations, their clinical use has increased. Yet, questions have arisen as to how BUP binding to mu-opioid receptors (μORs), the neurobiological target for this medication, relate to its clinical application. BUP produces dose- and time-related alterations of μOR availability but some clinicians express concern about whether doses higher than those needed to prevent opioid withdrawal symptoms are warranted, and policymakers consider limiting reimbursement for certain BUP dosing regimens.

methodsWe review scientific data concerning BUP-induced changes in μOR availability and their relationship to clinical efficacy.

resultsWithdrawal suppression appears to require ≤50% μOR availability, associated with BUP trough plasma concentrations ≥1 ng/mL; for most patients, this may require single daily BUP doses of 4 mg to defend against trough levels, or lower divided doses. Blockade of the reinforcing and subjective effects of typical doses of abused opioids require <20% μOR availability, associated with BUP trough plasma concentrations ≥3 ng/mL; for most individuals, this may require single daily BUP doses >16 mg, or lower divided doses. For individuals attempting to surmount this blockade with higher-than-usual doses of abused opioids, even larger BUP doses and <10% μOR availability would be required.

conclusionFor these reasons, and given the complexities of studies on this issue and comorbid problems, we conclude that fixed, arbitrary limits on BUP doses in clinical care or limits on reimbursement for this care are unwarranted.

Indexed as

Health PolicyAdministration, SublingualAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineHumansNaloxoneOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersProtein BindingReceptors, Opioid, muAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineNaloxoneReceptors, Opioid, muBuprenorphineOpioid dependenceOpioid receptorsPolicyPositron emission tomographyTreatment

Identifiers

PMID25179217
PMCPMC4252738
OpenAlexW2056888894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.