Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25179144›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2014

The relative ages of eukaryotes and akaryotes.

David Penny, Lesley J Collins, Toni K Daly, Simon J Cox

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Early Microbial Evolution: The Age of Anaerobes.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
  7. Endosymbiotic theories for eukaryote origin.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
  8. Eukaryotes first: how could that be?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
  9. Epigenetics, Darwin, and Lamarck.Genome biology and evolution · 2015
    Article
  10. The universal tree of life: an update.Frontiers in microbiology · 2015
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David PennyInstitute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand, d.penny@massey.ac.nz.
Lesley J Collins
Toni K Daly
Simon J Cox
Massey University · NZNorthland District Health Board · NZUniversal College of Learning · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Last Eukaryote Common Ancestor (LECA) appears to have the genetics required for meiosis, mitosis, nucleus and nuclear substructures, an exon/intron gene structure, spliceosomes, many centres of DNA replication, etc. (and including mitochondria). Most of these features are not generally explained by models for the origin of the Eukaryotic cell based on the fusion of an Archeon and a Bacterium. We find that the term 'prokaryote' is ambiguous and the non-phylogenetic term akaryote should be used in its place because we do not yet know the direction of evolution between eukaryotes and akaryotes. We use the term 'protoeukaryote' for the hypothetical stem group ancestral eukaryote that took up a bacterium as an endosymbiont that formed the mitochondrion. It is easier to make detailed models with a eukaryote to an akaryote transition, rather than vice versa. So we really are at a phylogenetic impasse in not being confident about the direction of change between eukaryotes and akaryotes.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionOrigin of LifeArchaeaCell NucleusEukaryotic CellsExonsIntronsMeiosisMitochondriaMitosisPhylogenyProkaryotic CellsSpliceosomesTerminology as TopicTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID25179144
OpenAlexW1971915012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.