Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25179066›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2014

Diagnosing headache in primary care: a qualitative study of GPs' approaches.

Stefan Bösner, Simone Hartel, Judith Diederich, Erika Baum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Intergroup time bias and aversive racism in the medical context.Journal of personality and social psychology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Perceptions, experiences, and understandings of cluster headache among GPs and neurologists: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The value of the GP's clinical judgement in predicting dementia: a multicentre prospective cohort study among patients in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Individual utilisation thresholds and exploring how GPs' knowledge of their patients affects diagnosis: a qualitative study in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  18. The Role of Physicians' First Impressions in the Diagnosis of Possible Cancers without Alarm Symptoms.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2017
    Article
  19. After Achilles.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stefan BösnerDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Marburg, Germany.
Simone HartelDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Marburg, Germany.
Judith DiederichDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Marburg, Germany.
Erika BaumDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Marburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeadache is one of the most common symptoms in primary care. Most headaches are due to primary headaches and many headache sufferers do not receive a specific diagnosis. There is still a gap in research on how GPs diagnose and treat patients with headache.

aimTo identify GPs' diagnostic approaches in patients presenting with headache. DESIGN AND

settingQualitative study with 15 GPs in urban and rural practices.

methodInterviews (20-40 minutes) were conducted using a semi-structured interview guideline. GPs described their individual diagnostic strategies by means of patients presenting with headache that they had prospectively identified during the previous 4 weeks. Interviews were taped and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative analysis was conducted by two independent raters.

resultsRegarding GPs' general diagnostic approach to patients with headache, four broad themes emerged during the interviews: 'knowing the patient and their background', 'first impression during consultation', 'intuition and personal experience' and 'application of the test of time'. Four further themes were identified regarding the management of diagnostic uncertainty: 'identification of red flags', 'use of the familiarity heuristic', 'therapeutic trial', and 'triggers for patient referral'.

conclusionGPs apply different strategies in the early diagnostic phase when managing patients with headache. Identification of potential adverse outcomes accompanied by other strategies for handling uncertainty seem to be more important than an exact diagnosis. Established guidelines do not play a role in the diagnostic workup.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareReferral and ConsultationEarly DiagnosisFemaleGeneral PractitionersGermanyHeadacheHumansMaleMedical History TakingPhysician-Patient RelationsPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prospective StudiesQualitative Researchdiagnosisgeneral practiceheadachequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID25179066
PMCPMC4141609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.