Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25179065›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2014

GPs' experiences with brief intervention for medication-overuse headache: a qualitative study in general practice.

Jan C Frich, Espen Saxhaug Kristoffersen, Christofer Lundqvist

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06032715 (Brief Intervention for Reducing Prolonged Use of Sleep Medication Among Elderly), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06032715 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Brief Intervention for Reducing Prolonged Use of Sleep Medication Among Elderly

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AkershusRan2023 to 2025Enrolled120ConditionsHarmful Use of HypnoticArmsBI (Brief Intervention)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jan C FrichInstitute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Espen Saxhaug KristoffersenDepartment of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo; HØKH, Research Centre, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Christofer LundqvistHØKH, Research Centre, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Campus Akershus University Hospital, University of Oslo, Nordbyhagen; Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Nordbyhagen, Norway.
University of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication-overuse headache (MOH) is common in the general population, and most patients are managed in primary health care. Brief Intervention (BI) has been used as a motivational technique for patients with drug and alcohol overuse, and may a have role in the treatment of MOH.

aimTo explore GPs' experiences using BI in the management of patients with MOH. DESIGN AND

settingQualitative study in Norwegian general practice.

methodData were collected through four focus group interviews with 22 GPs who participated in an intervention study on BI for MOH. Systematic text condensation was used to analyse transcripts from the focus group interviews.

resultsThe GPs experienced challenges when trying to convince patients that the medication they used to treat and prevent headache could cause headache, but labelling MOH as a diagnosis opened up a space for change. GPs were able to use BI within the scope of a regular consultation, and they thought that the structured approach had a potential to change patients' views about their condition and medication use. Being diagnosed with medication overuse could bring about feelings of guilt in patients, and GPs emphasised that a good alliance with the patient was necessary for successful change using BI to manage MOH.

conclusionGPs experience BI as a feasible strategy to treat MOH, and the technique relies on a good alliance between the doctor and patient. When using BI, GPs must be prepared to counter patients' misconceptions about medication used for headache.

Indexed as

General PracticeAdultDouble-Blind MethodDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleFocus GroupsHeadache Disorders, SecondaryHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayPatient Education as TopicQualitative Researchanalgesic/adverse effectsheadache disorder, secondaryprimary care, qualitative study

Identifiers

PMID25179065
PMCPMC4141608
OpenAlexW2124989864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.