Trial reportMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2014
[Indocyanine green elimination for the evaluation of liver function: prognostic value in patients with community-acquired sepsis].
Trial report in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive Value of Indocyanine Green Plasma Disappearance Rate on Liver Function and Complications After Liver Transplantation.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of our clinical study was to correlate liver function measured by indocyanine green (ICG) elimination and clinical outcomes in patients with an early stage of community-acquired sepsis (CAS). MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 341 patients (≥ 18 years) presenting with suspicion of CAS or evidence of an infection and fulfillment of ≥ 2 systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria were included in the observational study"Prognosis of early sepsis 2" (Prognose der frühen Sepsis 2, ProFS 2). Patients who had been hospitalized within the last 7 days were excluded. In a subgroup of these patients (n = 72) who were transferred to an intensive or intermediate care unit according to the clinical judgment of the treating physicians, ICG elimination (plasma disappearance rate, ICG-PDR; 15 min retention rate, ICG-R15) was assessed by using a noninvasive monitoring system (LiMON, PULSION Medical Systems, Germany). ICG-PDR and -R15 were determined on the day of admission (n = 72) and after 96 h (n = 34). The primary end point of the study was defined as death within 30 days. Secondary endpoints were need for renal replacement therapy, requirement for invasive mechanical ventilation, and length of stay in an intermediate or intensive care unit. RESULTS AND
conclusionIn contrast to patients with sepsis or severe sepsis, ICG elimination was found to be significantly impaired in patients with septic shock. Furthermore, a significant predictive value of ICG-PDR and -R15 on the day of admission for the need for subsequent renal replacement therapy (n = 12) was observed. In addition, reduced ICG elimination was associated with a longer stay in an intermediate or intensive care unit. However, ICG elimination on admission could not predict 30-day mortality (n = 14) or requirement of mechanical ventilation (n = 20).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.