Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25178814›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2015

Effects of the novel, selective and low-efficacy mu opioid receptor ligand NAQ on intracranial self-stimulation in rats.

Ahmad A Altarifi, Yunyun Yuan, Yan Zhang, Dana E Selley, S Stevens Negus

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Medications Development for Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahmad A AltarifiFaculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, 22110, Jordan.
Yunyun Yuan
Yan Zhang
Dana E Selley
S Stevens Negus
Virginia Commonwealth University · USJordan University of Science and Technology · JO

Funding

Medications Development for Stimulant AbuseR01DA026946 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI NEGUS, SIDNEY S · 2009 to 2019
$3.7M
Non-peptide Mu Opioid Receptor Selective AntagonistsR01DA024022 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, YAN · 2009 to 2019
$3.5M
Neurobiology and Treatment of PainR01NS070715 · NINDS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI NEGUS, SIDNEY S, SELLEY, DANA E · 2009 to 2018
$3.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA024022NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA024022NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA026946NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA026946NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS070715NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS070715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleLow-efficacy mu opioid receptor agonists may be useful for some clinical indications, but clinically available low-efficacy mu agonists also have low selectivity for mu vs. kappa opioid receptors. NAQ (17-cyclopropylmethyl-3,14ß-dihydroxy-4,5α-epoxy-6α-[(3'-isoquinolyl)acetamido]morphinan) is a novel opioid receptor ligand with low-efficacy at mu receptors and greater mu-receptor selectivity than existing low-efficacy agonists.

objectivesThis study examined behavioral effects of NAQ in rats using an intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) procedure that has been used previously to examine other opioids. NAQ effects were examined before, during, and after chronic morphine treatment, and effects of NAQ were compared to effects of nalbuphine and naltrexone.

methodsAdult male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to respond for electrical brain stimulation delivered via electrodes implanted in the medial forebrain bundle. A range of brain stimulation frequencies maintained a wide range of baseline ICSS rates. Effects of NAQ (0.32-10 mg/kg), nalbuphine (1.0 mg/kg), and naltrexone (0.1 mg/kg) were determined before morphine treatment and during treatment with 3.2 and 18 mg/kg/day morphine. NAQ effects were also redetermined beginning 2 weeks after termination of morphine treatment.

resultsNAQ produced weak ICSS facilitation in morphine-naïve rats but more robust ICSS facilitation during and after morphine treatment and also reversed morphine withdrawal-associated depression of ICSS. These effects were similar to effects of nalbuphine.

conclusionsThese results agree with the in vitro characterization of NAQ as a low-efficacy mu agonist. Opioid exposure may enhance abuse-related effects of NAQ, but NAQ may also serve as a low-efficacy and relatively safe option for treatment of opioid withdrawal or dependence.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainElectrodes, ImplantedLigandsMaleMedial Forebrain BundleMorphinansRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, Opioid, kappaReceptors, Opioid, muSelf StimulationSubstrate Specificity17-cyclopropylmethyl-3,14-dihydroxy-4,5-epoxy-6-((3'-isoquinolyl)acetamido)morphinanLigandsMorphinansReceptors, Opioid, kappaReceptors, Opioid, mu

Identifiers

PMID25178814
PMCPMC4310756
OpenAlexW2018294583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.