ArticleInternational journal of public health2014
Close relations to parents and emotional symptoms among adolescents: beyond socio-economic impact?
Article in International journal of public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mental well-being in adolescence and eight years of follow-up for mental illness, risky behaviours, and mortality in 67,945 15-19-year-olds: a prospective cohort study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
- Loneliness and ease of communication with parents and friends: cross-sectional study of adolescents in Denmark.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Persistent Social Inequality in Adolescent Health Indicators 1991-2022: Trend Study From Denmark.International journal of public health · 2024Article
- The associations between social environment and adolescents' psychosomatic health: An ecological perspective.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Mental health groups in high school students and later school dropout: a latent class and register-based follow-up analysis of the Danish National Youth Study.BMC psychology · 2021Article
- Who Benefits From Being an Only Child? A Study of Parent-Child Relationship Among Chinese Junior High School Students.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Positive parenting attitudes and practices in three transitional Eastern European countries: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Macedonia and Serbia.International journal of public health · 2016Article
- Breakfast frequency among adolescents: associations with measures of family functioning.Public health nutrition · 2016Article
- Does self-efficacy mediate the association between socioeconomic background and emotional symptoms among schoolchildren?International journal of public health · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study examined the relationship between trustful communication with parents and frequency of emotional symptoms in schoolchildren and whether this relationship was modified by the family's socio-economic position.
methodsPooled data (n = 15,646) from the Danish Health Behaviour in School-aged Children surveys 2002, 2006 and 2010 were analysed by multilevel multivariable logistic regression.
results8 % of all schoolchildren reported emotional symptoms almost daily. Odds ratio for daily symptoms was 2.1 (1.8-2.4) for children without trustful communication with parents compared to children with trustful communication. This association appears unaffected by family occupational class. A substantial socio-economic gradient in emotional symptoms persisted, independent of parent-child communication.
conclusionsTrustful communication with parents might have a fundamental importance, regardless of socio-economic position.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.