Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25178632›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2015

Delirium in patients with cancer: assessment, impact, mechanisms and management.

Peter G Lawlor, Shirley H Bush

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Association among rescue neuroleptic use, agitation, and perceived comfort: secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial on agitated delirium.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter G LawlorDivision of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Bruyère Research Institute and Bruyère Continuing Care, 43 Bruyère Street, Ottawa, ON K1N 5C8, Canada.
Shirley H BushDivision of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Bruyère Research Institute and Bruyère Continuing Care, 43 Bruyère Street, Ottawa, ON K1N 5C8, Canada.
Bruyère · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delirium is a frequent neurocognitive complication in patients with cancer, particularly in patients with advanced-stage disease (in whom a combination of factors might trigger an episode) and in patients with a high degree of predisposing vulnerability, such as the elderly or patients with dementia. The communicative impediments associated with delirium generate distress for the patient and their family, and substantive challenges for health-care practitioners, who might have to contend with agitation, and difficulty in assessing pain and other symptoms. Validated assessment tools exist for screening, diagnosing and monitoring the severity of delirium in cancer care. The level of investigative and therapeutic intervention in a delirium episode is determined by the patient's estimated prognosis and the agreed goals of care. Although delirium is ominously associated with the terminal phase of life, part or complete reversal can be possible depending on the nature of the precipitating factors, and on whether investigation and treatment of these factors is consistent with the established goals of care. Pharmacological treatment for symptom control is indicated for most patients with delirium, and antipsychotics are the drugs of choice, but some patients with refractory and nonreversible delirium can require continuous deep sedation with agents such as midazolam.

Indexed as

DeliriumHumansMass ScreeningNeoplasmsProcedural SedationPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID25178632
OpenAlexW2061859480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.