ArticleAsian-Australasian journal of animal sciences2014
Genetic diversity and relationships of korean chicken breeds based on 30 microsatellite markers.
Article in Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Divergent ancestry of Korean native and Thai chickens with independent gene pool retention by Korean commercial chickens.Animal bioscience · 2026Article
- Chromosome-level Genome Assembly of Korean Long-tailed Chicken and Pangenome of 40 Gallus gallus Assemblies.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Characterisation of runs of homozygosity and inbreeding coefficients in the red-brown Korean native chickens.Animal bioscience · 2024Article
- Estimating genetic diversity and population structure of 22 chicken breeds in Asia using microsatellite markers.Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences · 2020Article
- Major histocompatibility complex B variability in Korean native chicken breeds.Poultry science · 2020Article
- Genetic diversity of MHC-B in 12 chicken populations in Korea revealed by single-nucleotide polymorphisms.Immunogenetics · 2020Article
- Deciphering the Patterns of Genetic Admixture and Diversity in the Ecuadorian Creole Chicken.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019Article
- Genetic diversity of 21 experimental chicken lines with diverse origins and genetic backgrounds.Experimental animals · 2019Article
- Morphological defects of sperm and their association with motility, fertility, and hatchability in four Korean native chicken breeds.Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences · 2018Article
- Microsatellite based genetic diversity study in indigenous chicken ecotypes of Karnataka.Veterinary world · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effective management of endangered animal genetic resources is one of the most important concerns of modern breeding. Evaluation of genetic diversity and relationship of local breeds is an important factor towards the identification of unique and valuable genetic resources. This study aimed to analyze the genetic diversity and population structure of six Korean native chicken breeds (n = 300), which were compared with three imported breeds in Korea (n = 150). For the analysis of genetic diversity, 30 microsatellite markers from FAO/ISAG recommended diversity panel or previously reported microsatellite markers were used. The number of alleles ranged from 2 to 15 per locus, with a mean of 8.13. The average observed heterozygosity within native breeds varied between 0.46 and 0.59. The overall heterozygote deficiency (F IT) in native chicken was 0.234±0.025. Over 30.7% of F IT was contributed by within-population deficiency (F IS). Bayesian clustering analysis, using the STRUCTURE software suggested 9 clusters. This study may provide the background for future studies to identify the genetic uniqueness of the Korean native chicken breeds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.