Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25177766›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2014

PSEA-Quant: a protein set enrichment analysis on label-free and label-based protein quantification data.

Mathieu Lavallée-Adam, Navin Rauniyar, Daniel B McClatchy, John R Yates

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03800342 (Recovery, Fatigability, and Proteomic Response to Aerobic Exercise Training in Healthy Individuals), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03800342 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Recovery, Fatigability, and Proteomic Response to Aerobic Exercise Training in Healthy Individuals

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeorge Mason UniversityRan2019 to 2019Enrolled21ConditionsAdult, FatigueArmsAerobic Exercise Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Serum/Plasma Proteome in Non-Malignant Liver Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. SETD2 regulates the methylation of translation elongation factor eEF1A1 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Kidney cancer journal : official journal of the Kidney Cancer Association · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Bioinformatics Methods for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Data Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mathieu Lavallée-AdamDepartment of Chemical Physiology, The Scripps Research Institute , 10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, California 92037, United States.
Navin Rauniyar
Daniel B McClatchy
John R Yates
Scripps Research Institute · US

Funding

TrainingP41GM103533 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MACCOSS, MICHAEL · 2012 to 2021
$20.7M
Proteogenetics of Autism Spectrum DisordersR01MH100175 · NIMH · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI MUOTRI, ALYSSON R., YATES III, JOHN R · 2013 to 2025
$7.4M
Quantitative Proteome Analysis of Brain DevelopmentR01MH067880 · NIMH · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI YATES III, JOHN R · 2003 to 2017
$7.1M
Proteomic Profiling of CFTR Protein InteractionR01HL079442 · NHLBI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI BALCH, WILLIAM EDWARD, YATES III, JOHN R · 2005 to 2014
$4.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201000035CNHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL079442NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103533NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103533-17NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH067880NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of large-scale proteomics quantification methods yield long lists of quantified proteins that are often difficult to interpret and poorly reproduced. Computational approaches are required to analyze such intricate quantitative proteomics data sets. We propose a statistical approach to computationally identify protein sets (e.g., Gene Ontology (GO) terms) that are significantly enriched with abundant proteins with reproducible quantification measurements across a set of replicates. To this end, we developed PSEA-Quant, a protein set enrichment analysis algorithm for label-free and label-based protein quantification data sets. It offers an alternative approach to classic GO analyses, models protein annotation biases, and allows the analysis of samples originating from a single condition, unlike analogous approaches such as GSEA and PSEA. We demonstrate that PSEA-Quant produces results complementary to GO analyses. We also show that PSEA-Quant provides valuable information about the biological processes involved in cystic fibrosis using label-free protein quantification of a cell line expressing a CFTR mutant. Finally, PSEA-Quant highlights the differences in the mechanisms taking place in the human, rat, and mouse brain frontal cortices based on tandem mass tag quantification. Our approach, which is available online, will thus improve the analysis of proteomics quantification data sets by providing meaningful biological insights.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBrainCell LineChromatography, LiquidComputational BiologyCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorDatabases, ProteinHumansMiceMutationProteinsProteomeProteomicsRatsTandem Mass SpectrometryCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorProteinsProteomebioinformaticscomputational biologycystic fibrosisgene ontologygene set enrichment analysisisobaric tandem mass taggingmass spectrometryprotein quantificationspectral countingstatistics

Identifiers

PMID25177766
PMCPMC4258137
OpenAlexW2315519665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.