Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25177492›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in vaccines2014

Killed oral cholera vaccines: history, development and implementation challenges.

Anna Lena Lopez, Maria Liza Antoinette Gonzales, Josephine G Aldaba, G Balakrish Nair

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in vaccines, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Oral killed cholera vaccines for preventing cholera.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Recent epidemiological and management approaches for cholera in India.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Intracellular Expression of CTB inJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. InactivatedJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Diagnosis, Management, and Future Control of Cholera.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. An Update on Cholera Immunity and Current and Future Cholera Vaccines.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna Lena LopezInstitute of Child Health and Human Development, University of the Philippines Manila-National Institutes of Health, 623 P. Gil St., Manila 1000, Philippines.
Maria Liza Antoinette GonzalesDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Josephine G AldabaInstitute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
G Balakrish NairTranslational Health Science and Technology Institute, Haryana, India.
University of the Philippines Manila · PHTranslational Health Science and Technology Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cholera is still a major global health problem, affecting mainly people living in unsanitary conditions and who are at risk for outbreaks of cholera. During the past decade, outbreaks are increasingly reported from more countries. From the early killed oral cholera vaccine, rapid improvements in vaccine development occurred as a result of a better understanding of the epidemiology of the disease, pathogenesis of cholera infection and immunity. The newer-generation oral killed cholera vaccines have been shown to be safe and effective in field trials conducted in cholera endemic areas. Likewise, they have been shown to be protective when used during outbreak settings. Aside from providing direct protection to vaccinated individuals, recent studies have demonstrated that these killed oral vaccines also confer indirect protection through herd immunity. Although new-generation oral cholera vaccines should not be considered in isolation from other preventive approaches in countries where they are most needed, especially improved water quality and sanitation, these vaccines serve as immediately available public health tools for preventing further morbidity and mortality from cholera. However, despite its availability for more than two decades, use of these vaccines has not been optimized. Although there are limitations of the currently available oral cholera vaccines, recent data show that the vaccines are safe, feasible to use even in difficult circumstances and able to provide protection in various settings. Clear identification of the areas and target population groups who will benefit from the use of the cholera vaccines will be required and strategies to facilitate accessibility and usage of these vaccines in these areas and population groups will need to be developed.

Indexed as

choleracholera vaccineoral cholera vaccineVibrio cholerae

Identifiers

PMID25177492
PMCPMC4144262
OpenAlexW2125293782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.