AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2014.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Mistletoe Extracts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Integrative cancer therapies
   Pooled it
2. Romancing the Boost - the Higher, the Better?Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015
   Article
3. The Right Treatment for the Right Patient - Personalised Treatment of Breast Cancer.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2015
   Review
4. Targeted Therapies in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer - a Systematic Review.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015
   Review
5. St. Gallen/Vienna 2015: A Brief Summary of the Consensus Discussion.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015
   Review
6. Staging for Breast Cancer: A Comparison Between Old and New Approaches.Cancer diagnosis & prognosis
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as