Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25176973›Full record

ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2014

New clinical research strategies in thoracic oncology: clinical trial design, adaptive, basket and umbrella trials, new end-points and new evaluations of response.

Jessica Menis, Baktiar Hasan, Benjamin Besse

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Master protocol trials in oncology: Review and new trial designs.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jessica MenisMedical Dept, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium. Statistical Dept, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium. Dept of Cancer Medicine/Thoracic Unit, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France.
Baktiar HasanMedical Dept, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium. Statistical Dept, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium. Dept of Cancer Medicine/Thoracic Unit, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France.
Benjamin BesseMedical Dept, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium. Statistical Dept, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium. Dept of Cancer Medicine/Thoracic Unit, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif, France. benjamin.besse@gustaveroussy.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the genomics era, our main goal should be to identify large and meaningful differences in small, molecularly selected groups of patients. Classical phase I, II and III models for drug development require large resources, limiting the number of experimental agents that can be tested and making the evaluation of targeted agents inefficient. There is an urgent need to streamline the development of new compounds, with the aim of identifying "trials designed to learn", which could lead to subsequent "trials designed to conclude". Basket trials are often viewed as parallel phase II trials within the same entity, designed on the basis of a common denominator, which can be a molecular alteration(s). Most basket trials are histology-independent and aberration-specific clinical trials. Umbrella trials are built on a centrally performed molecular portrait and molecularly selected cohorts with matched drugs, and can include patients' randomisation and strategy validation. Beyond new designs, new end-points and new evaluation techniques are also warranted to finally achieve methodology and clinical improvements, in particular within immunotherapy trials.

Indexed as

Research DesignDiagnostic ImagingHumansImmunotherapyThoracic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID25176973
PMCPMC9487319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.