ReviewEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2014
Clinical utility of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: a descriptive summary of current efficacy trials.
Review in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Yogliptin monotherapy in type 2 diabetes: A 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study.Journal of diabetes · 2022Trial
- Comparative analysis of dapagliflozin and linagliptin in managing type 2 diabetes mellitus and heart failure: A retrospective study.Medicine · 2025Observational
- Efficacy of three modern anti-diabetic drugs on survival outcomes of lung cancer patients with type 2 diabetes in China.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Effect of treatment duration on the associations between three modern antidiabetic drugs and survival outcomes of lung cancer in China.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
- DPP-4 inhibitors for treating T2DM - hype or hope? an analysis based on the current literature.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Review
- Should Side Effects Influence the Selection of Antidiabetic Therapies in Type 2 Diabetes?Current diabetes reports · 2017Review
- Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors Use and Relative Risk of Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease in Type 2 Diabetic Patients in a Case-Control Study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo review efficacy and safety data of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors used in treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
methodsA search of MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a service of the National Library of Medicine of the National Institutes of Health as well as of the original publications of individual trials with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors was carried out.
resultsDipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors are orally administered medications indicated for improved glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. They inhibit activity of the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase-4 responsible for inactivating nutrient-released incretin hormones (mainly glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide). As a result, the effect of the incretin hormones is enhanced, leading to improved β-cell function and inhibition of the glucagon secretion from the pancreatic islets. Patients can expect to see lowering of fasting and postprandial glucose levels (by 0.5-1 mmol/l and 2-3 mmol/l, respectively), leading to reduction of hemoglobin A1c by 0.5-0.9% (depending on the baseline hemoglobin A1c).
conclusionDipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors are generally well tolerated, with minimal risks of hypoglycemia or weight gain. Many postmarketing and surveillance studies are now conducted which focus on long-term safety and cardiovascular outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.