Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25176148›Full record

ReviewCell metabolism2014

Mapping the inner workings of the microbiome: genomic- and metagenomic-based study of metabolism and metabolic interactions in the human microbiome.

Ohad Manor, Roie Levy, Elhanan Borenstein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell metabolism, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Opportunities at the Interface of Network Science and Metabolic Modeling.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ohad ManorDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98102, USA.
Roie LevyDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98102, USA.
Elhanan BorensteinDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98102, USA; Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98102, USA; Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA. Electronic address: elbo@uw.edu.

Funding

A Computational Framework for Designing Microbiome ManipulationDP2AT007802 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BORENSTEIN, ELHANAN · 2012 to 2012
$2.3M
NCCIH NIH HHS DP2 AT007802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human gut microbiome is a major contributor to human metabolism and health, yet the metabolic processes that are carried out by various community members, the way these members interact with each other and with the host, and the impact of such interactions on the overall metabolic machinery of the microbiome have not yet been mapped. Here, we discuss recent efforts to study the metabolic inner workings of this complex ecosystem. We will specifically highlight two interrelated lines of work, the first aiming to deconvolve the microbiome and to characterize the metabolic capacity of various microbiome species and the second aiming to utilize computational modeling to infer and study metabolic interactions between these species.

Indexed as

MetabolomicsMetagenomicsMicrobiotaBacteriaComputer SimulationFungiHumansMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMetabolomeMetagenomeMicrobial InteractionsModels, Biological

Identifiers

PMID25176148
PMCPMC4252837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.