Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25175545›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2014

Confidence interval estimation in R-DAS.

Olga A Vsevolozhskaya, James C Anthony

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Inter-relationships Linking Probability of Becoming a Case of Nicotine Dependence With Frequency of Tobacco Cigarette Smoking.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Transitioning from First Drug Use to Dependence Onset: Illustration of a Multiparametric Approach for Comparative Epidemiology.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Olga A VsevolozhskayaMichigan State University, United States.
James C AnthonyMichigan State University, United States. Electronic address: janthony@msu.edu.

Funding

Training Program in Drug Dependence EpidemiologyT32DA021129 · NIDA · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ANTHONY, JAMES CHRISTOPHER · 2006 to 2016
$2.7M
Drug Dependence Epidemiology and EnviromicsK05DA015799 · NIDA · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ANTHONY, JAMES CHRISTOPHER · 2003 to 2015
$1.4M
NIDA NIH HHS K05 DA015799NIDA NIH HHS K05DA015799NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA021129NIDA NIH HHS T32DA021129
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoughly 25 years ago, the United States National Institute on Drug Abuse (US NIDA) initiated the creation of public use datasets for its National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, since re-named the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), which assumed responsibility for the survey in 1992, has continued and expanded this effort to make the survey data available to researchers. During 2012, SAMHSA created a "Restricted-Use Data Analysis System" (R-DAS) to provide researchers with the capability to create tabulations using restricted NSDUH variables not otherwise available on the public-use files.

methodsThis methods focused article is intended to help potential users of R-DAS-like online data analysis systems by (i) clarifying statistical issues involving approximation of confidence intervals (CI), (ii) providing a way to estimate CI when tabular output is suppressed with an 'error message' based on confidentiality restrictions, and (iii) showing how to make pairwise comparisons of estimates not otherwise allowed.

resultsFor illustration purposes, some empirical estimates are presented on a topic of continuing of public health concern in the US namely, extra-medical use of pain relievers (generally opioids), where the drugs are being used to get high and otherwise outside the boundaries intended by prescribing clinicians.

conclusionThe R-DAS makes it possible to derive state-level estimates of male-female and age-related differences in incidence of extra-medical prescription pain reliever (EMPPR) use, not previously reported in peer-reviewed articles, and not available without research approaches described here.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAge FactorsAnalgesics, OpioidConfidence IntervalsDatabases, FactualFemaleHealth SurveysHumansIncidenceMaleSex FactorsSubstance-Related DisordersUnited StatesUnited States Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services AdministrationAnalgesics, OpioidIncidenceMisuseOpiatesOpioidsPain relieversR-DAS

Identifiers

PMID25175545
PMCPMC6003776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.