Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25174762›Full record

ArticleGeneral hospital psychiatry

Collaborative care psychiatrists' views on treating bipolar disorder in primary care: a qualitative study.

Joseph M Cerimele, Abigail C Halperin, Clarence Spigner, Anna Ratzliff, Wayne J Katon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in General hospital psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Financing for Collaborative Care - A Narrative Review.Current treatment options in psychiatry · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Bipolar Disorder in Primary Care: Integrated Care Experiences.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joseph M CerimeleUniversity of Washington School of Medicine Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: cerimele@uw.edu.
Abigail C HalperinUniversity of Washington School of Public Health Department of Health Services, Seattle, WA, USA; University of Washington School of Medicine Department of Family Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Clarence SpignerUniversity of Washington School of Public Health Department of Health Services, Seattle, WA, USA.
Anna RatzliffUniversity of Washington School of Medicine Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA.
Wayne J KatonUniversity of Washington School of Medicine Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Psychiatry Primary Care NRSA T-32 AwardT32MH020021 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JOHN C. FORTNEY, JURGEN UNUTZER · 1998 to 2026
$5.6M
NIMH NIH HHS 5-T32MH020021-15NIMH NIH HHS L30 MH101709NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand collaborative care psychiatric consultants' views and practices on making the diagnosis of and recommending treatment for bipolar disorder in primary care using collaborative care.

methodWe conducted a focus group at the University of Washington in December 2013 with nine psychiatric consultants working in primary-care-based collaborative care in Washington State. A grounded theory approach with open coding and the constant comparative method revealed categories where emergent themes were saturated and validated through member checking, and a conceptual model was developed.

resultsThree major themes emerged from the data including the importance of working as a collaborative care team, the strengths of collaborative care for treating bipolar disorder and the need for psychiatric consultants to adapt specialty psychiatric clinical skills to the primary care setting. Other discussion topics included gathering clinical data from multiple sources over time, balancing risks and benefits of treating patients indirectly, tracking patient care outcomes with a registry and effective care.

conclusionExperienced psychiatric consultants working in collaborative care teams provided their perceptions regarding treating patients with bipolar illness including identifying ways to adapt specialty psychiatric skills, developing techniques for providing team-based care and perceiving the care delivered through collaborative care as high quality.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCooperative BehaviorPrimary Health CarePsychiatryAdultBipolar DisorderCase ManagementDisease ManagementFocus GroupsHumansMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationBipolar disorderCollaborative careMood disordersPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID25174762
PMCPMC4253651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.