Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25174373›Full record

Observational studyHIV medicine2015

Predictors of unstructured antiretroviral treatment interruption and resumption among HIV-positive individuals in Canada.

H Samji, T E Taha, D Moore, A N Burchell, A Cescon, C Cooper, J M Raboud, M B Klein, M R Loutfy, N Machouf and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in HIV medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Factors related to loss to follow-up among people living with HIV: a systematic review.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

H SamjiDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, Canada.
T E Taha
D Moore
A N Burchell
A Cescon
C Cooper
J M Raboud
M B Klein
M R Loutfy
N Machouf
C M Tsoukas
J S G Montaner
R S Hogg
Canadian Observational Cohort (CANOC) Collaboration

Funding

Seek and Treat for Optimal Prevention of HIV & AIDS (STOP HIV/AIDS) in BCR01DA036307 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI MONTANER, JULIO SERGIO GONZALEZ · 2013 to 2017
$3.0M
CIHR 125948-1CIHR 129971-1NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSustained optimal use of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) has been shown to decrease morbidity, mortality and HIV transmission. However, incomplete adherence and treatment interruption (TI) remain challenges to the full realization of the promise of cART. We estimated trends and predictors of treatment interruption and resumption among individuals in the Canadian Observational Cohort (CANOC) collaboration.

methodscART-naïve individuals ≥ 18 years of age who initiated cART between 2000 and 2011 were included in the study. We defined TIs as ≥ 90 consecutive days off cART. We used descriptive analyses to study TI trends over time and Cox regression to identify factors predicting time to first TI and time to treatment resumption after a first TI.

resultsA total of 7633 participants were eligible for inclusion in the study, of whom 1860 (24.5%) experienced a TI. The prevalence of TI in the first calendar year of cART decreased by half over the study period. Our analyses highlighted a higher risk of TI among women [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.59; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.33-1.92], younger individuals (aHR 1.27; 95% CI 1.15-1.37 per decade increase), earlier treatment initiators (CD4 count ≥ 350 vs. <200 cells/μL: aHR 1.46; 95% CI 1.17-1.81), Aboriginal participants (aHR 1.67; 95% CI 1.27-2.20), injecting drug users (aHR 1.43; 95% CI 1.09-1.89) and users of zidovudine vs. tenofovir in the initial cART regimen (aHR 2.47; 95% CI 1.92-3.20). Conversely, factors predicting treatment resumption were male sex, older age, and a CD4 cell count <200 cells/μL at cART initiation.

conclusionsDespite significant improvements in cART since its advent, our results demonstrate that TIs remain relatively prevalent. Strategies to support continuous HIV treatment are needed to maximize the benefits of cART.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-HIV AgentsCanadaCD4 Lymphocyte CountCohort StudiesDirective CounselingDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationFollow-Up StudiesHIV InfectionsHumansIncidenceMedication AdherenceAnti-HIV Agentsantiretroviral therapyCanadaHIVretentiontreatment interruption

Identifiers

PMID25174373
PMCPMC4300259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.