Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25174045›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health (Oxford, England)2015

What kinds of policies to reduce health inequalities in the UK do researchers support?

Katherine E Smith, Mor Kandlik Eltanani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. A Good Society (and how we make it).Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Young people's perspectives on addressing UK health inequalities: utopian visions and preferences for action.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Eliciting public values on health inequalities: missing evidence forEvidence & policy : a journal of research, debate and practice · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Devolution of power, revolution in public health?Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2017
    Article
  20. Social interventions in mental health: a call to action.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katherine E SmithGlobal Public Health Unit, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9LD, UK.
Mor Kandlik EltananiSociology, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9LD, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite a wealth of research and policy initiatives, progress in tackling the UK's health inequalities has been limited. This article explores whether there appears to be consensus among researchers about the kinds of policies likely to reduce health inequalities.

methodsNinety-nine proposals for addressing health inequalities were identified from multiple sources. Forty-one researchers participated in a survey assessing the extent to which they believed each proposal would reduce health inequalities, based on three criteria. The 20 proposals generating most support were employed in a second stage, in which 92 researchers indicated which proposals they felt would have the greatest impact on reducing health inequalities.

resultsSome consensus exists among researchers about the policy approaches likely to reduce UK health inequalities: a more progressive distribution of income/wealth, greater investment in services for deprived communities, plus regulatory policies to limit the impact of lifestyle-behavioural risks. However, researchers' support for proposals varies depending whether they are asked to express their expert opinion or to comment on the strength of the available evidence.

conclusionsWhen consulting researchers about health inequalities, policymakers need to consider whether they are seeking research-informed expertise or assessments of the available evidence; these questions are likely to yield different responses.

Indexed as

Health PolicyPolicy MakingHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services ResearchHumansResearch PersonnelSocioeconomic FactorsState MedicineUnited Kingdomevidence-based policyhealth inequalitiessocial determinants

Identifiers

PMID25174045
PMCPMC4340326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.