ArticleMycopathologia2015
Host factors and clinical outcomes of Candida colonization in critically ill patients.
Article in Mycopathologia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insights intoJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The impact of the Fungus-Host-Microbiota interplay upon Candida albicans infections: current knowledge and new perspectives.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2021Review
- The gut mycobiome: The overlooked constituent of clinical outcomes and treatment complications in patients with cancer and other immunosuppressive conditions.PLoS pathogens · 2020Article
- TargetingFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Lactoferrin, chitosan and Melaleuca alternifolia-natural products that show promise in candidiasis treatment.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to describe factors and outcomes associated with Candida colonization of critically ill patients. This was a cross-sectional study conducted over 2 weeks in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care hospital at the Texas Medical Center, Houston, TX. All Candida samples were prospectively collected with demographic and clinical data collected retrospectively. We examined 48 patients, 32 (67%) were colonized with Candida spp; 25 (52.1%) patients were isolated with Candida albicans and 18 (37.5%) were isolated with a non-albicans species, mostly commonly Candida glabrata. A multivariate analysis identified proton pump inhibitor administration at admission to ICU [odds ratio 5.66; 95% confidence interval 1.12-28.5] as associated with colonization. Patients colonized with Candida had a significantly longer length of ICU and hospital stays (7.6 ± 6.6 vs. 4.2 ± 2.6 days, P = 0.01 and 14.9 ± 12.9 vs. 7.5 ± 6.7 days, P = 0.02, respectively). Clonality testing between C. albicans and C. glabrata strains identified indistinguishable strains among the patient cohort. These data provide additional information on Candida colonization in critically ill patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25173925What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.