Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25173762›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2014

Environmental Research Translation: enhancing interactions with communities at contaminated sites.

Monica D Ramirez-Andreotta, Mark L Brusseau, Janick F Artiola, Raina M Maier, A Jay Gandolfi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Environmental health perceptions in a superfund community.Journal of environmental management · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Increasing Environmental Health Literacy through Contextual Learning in Communities at Risk.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Monica D Ramirez-AndreottaSoil, Water and Environmental Science Department, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States. Electronic address: m.ramirezandreotta@neu.edu.
Mark L BrusseauSoil, Water and Environmental Science Department, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States; Hydrology and Water Resources Department, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States.
Janick F ArtiolaSoil, Water and Environmental Science Department, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States.
Raina M MaierSoil, Water and Environmental Science Department, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States.
A Jay GandolfiPharmacology & Toxicology Department, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, United States.

Funding

TRANSPORT OF TRACE METALS IN A POLLUTED AQUIFERP42ES004940 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Jon D Chorover · 1990 to 2026
$68.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES004940NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES04940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The characterization and remediation of contaminated sites are complex endeavors fraught with numerous challenges. One particular challenge that is receiving increased attention is the development and encouragement of full participation by communities and community members affected by a given site in all facets of decision-making. Many disciplines have been grappling with the challenges associated with environmental and risk communication, public participation in environmental data generation, and decision-making and increasing community capacity. The concepts and methods developed by these disciplines are reviewed, with a focus on their relevance to the specific dynamics associated with environmental contamination sites. The contributions of these disciplines are then synthesized and integrated to help develop Environmental Research Translation (ERT), a proposed framework for environmental scientists to promote interaction and communication among involved parties at contaminated sites. This holistic approach is rooted in public participation approaches to science, which includes: a transdisciplinary team, effective collaboration, information transfer, public participation in environmental projects, and a cultural model of risk communication. Although there are challenges associated with the implementation of ERT, it is anticipated that application of this proposed translational science method could promote more robust community participation at contaminated sites.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationEnvironmental PollutionResidence CharacteristicsCommunicationEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationHumansResearchCommunity engagementContaminated sitesEnvironmental healthPublic participationSuperfund sites

Identifiers

PMID25173762
PMCPMC4186773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.