ArticleGenome biology and evolution2014
Evidence for deep regulatory similarities in early developmental programs across highly diverged insects.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Mechanisms of transcriptional regulation inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Conserved and novel enhancers in the Aedes aegypti single-minded locus recapitulate embryonic ventral midline gene expression.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- Article
- Mechanisms of transcriptional regulation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Review
- Review
- Identification of new Anopheles gambiae transcriptional enhancers using a cross-species prediction approach.Insect molecular biology · 2021Article
- Annotating the Insect Regulatory Genome.Insects · 2021Review
- The regulatory genome of the malaria vectorNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Comprehensive Genomic Discovery of Non-Coding Transcriptional Enhancers in the African Malaria VectorFrontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Behavior-related gene regulatory networks: A new level of organization in the brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Review
- Chromatin Structure and Function in Mosquitoes.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Review
- The Role of Chromatin Accessibility in cis-Regulatory Evolution.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
- Computational enhancer prediction: evaluation and improvements.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- REDfly: the transcriptional regulatory element database for Drosophila.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- CRM Discovery Beyond Model Insects.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2019Article
- Cross-species systems analysis of evolutionary toolkits of neurogenomic response to social challenge.Genes, brain, and behavior · 2019Article
- Prediction of gene regulatory enhancers across species reveals evolutionarily conserved sequence properties.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Enhancer identification and activity evaluation in the red flour beetle,Development (Cambridge, England) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many genes familiar from Drosophila development, such as the so-called gap, pair-rule, and segment polarity genes, play important roles in the development of other insects and in many cases appear to be deployed in a similar fashion, despite the fact that Drosophila-like "long germband" development is highly derived and confined to a subset of insect families. Whether or not these similarities extend to the regulatory level is unknown. Identification of regulatory regions beyond the well-studied Drosophila has been challenging as even within the Diptera (flies, including mosquitoes) regulatory sequences have diverged past the point of recognition by standard alignment methods. Here, we demonstrate that methods we previously developed for computational cis-regulatory module (CRM) discovery in Drosophila can be used effectively in highly diverged (250-350 Myr) insect species including Anopheles gambiae, Tribolium castaneum, Apis mellifera, and Nasonia vitripennis. In Drosophila, we have successfully used small sets of known CRMs as "training data" to guide the search for other CRMs with related function. We show here that although species-specific CRM training data do not exist, training sets from Drosophila can facilitate CRM discovery in diverged insects. We validate in vivo over a dozen new CRMs, roughly doubling the number of known CRMs in the four non-Drosophila species. Given the growing wealth of Drosophila CRM annotation, these results suggest that extensive regulatory sequence annotation will be possible in newly sequenced insects without recourse to costly and labor-intensive genome-scale experiments. We develop a new method, Regulus, which computes a probabilistic score of similarity based on binding site composition (despite the absence of nucleotide-level sequence alignment), and demonstrate similarity between functionally related CRMs from orthologous loci. Our work represents an important step toward being able to trace the evolutionary history of gene regulatory networks and defining the mechanisms underlying insect evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.